Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Nguyen, VQC; PrvuBettger, J; Guerrier, T; Hirsch, MA; Thomas, JG; Pugh, TM; Rhoads, CF
Published in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
July 2015

OBJECTIVE: To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96-.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48-.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55-.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71-.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77-.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

July 2015

Volume

96

Issue

7

Start / End Page

1297 / 1303

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities
  • Sex Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rehabilitation Centers
  • Rehabilitation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nguyen, V. Q. C., PrvuBettger, J., Guerrier, T., Hirsch, M. A., Thomas, J. G., Pugh, T. M., & Rhoads, C. F. (2015). Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 96(7), 1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007
Nguyen, Vu Q. C., Janet PrvuBettger, Tami Guerrier, Mark A. Hirsch, J George Thomas, Terrence M. Pugh, and Charles F. Rhoads. “Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96, no. 7 (July 2015): 1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007.
Nguyen VQC, PrvuBettger J, Guerrier T, Hirsch MA, Thomas JG, Pugh TM, et al. Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1297–303.
Nguyen, Vu Q. C., et al. “Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 96, no. 7, July 2015, pp. 1297–303. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.007.
Nguyen VQC, PrvuBettger J, Guerrier T, Hirsch MA, Thomas JG, Pugh TM, Rhoads CF. Factors associated with discharge to home versus discharge to institutional care after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1297–1303.
Journal cover image

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

July 2015

Volume

96

Issue

7

Start / End Page

1297 / 1303

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Skilled Nursing Facilities
  • Sex Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rehabilitation Centers
  • Rehabilitation