Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dy, SM; Herr, K; Bernacki, RE; Kamal, AH; Walling, AM; Ersek, M; Norton, SA
Published in: J Pain Symptom Manage
February 2016

Quality measurement is a critical tool for improving palliative care and hospice, but significant research is needed to improve the application of quality indicators. We defined methodological priorities for advancing the science of quality measurement in this field based on discussions of the Technical Advisory Panel of the Measuring What Matters consensus project of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association and a subsequent strategy meeting to better clarify research challenges, priorities, and quality measurement implementation strategies. In this article, we describe three key priorities: 1) defining the denominator(s) (or the population of interest) for palliative care quality indicators, 2) developing methods to measure quality from different data sources, and 3) conducting research to advance the development of patient/family-reported indicators. We then apply these concepts to the key quality domain of advance care planning and address relevance to implementation of indicators in improving care. Developing the science of quality measurement in these key areas of palliative care and hospice will facilitate improved quality measurement across all populations with serious illness and care for patients and families.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Pain Symptom Manage

DOI

EISSN

1873-6513

Publication Date

February 2016

Volume

51

Issue

2

Start / End Page

155 / 162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Design
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Palliative Care
  • Humans
  • Hospice Care
  • Family
  • Biomedical Research
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dy, S. M., Herr, K., Bernacki, R. E., Kamal, A. H., Walling, A. M., Ersek, M., & Norton, S. A. (2016). Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement. J Pain Symptom Manage, 51(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.019
Dy, Sydney Morss, Keela Herr, Rachelle E. Bernacki, Arif H. Kamal, Anne M. Walling, Mary Ersek, and Sally A. Norton. “Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement.J Pain Symptom Manage 51, no. 2 (February 2016): 155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.019.
Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE, Kamal AH, Walling AM, Ersek M, et al. Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):155–62.
Dy, Sydney Morss, et al. “Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement.J Pain Symptom Manage, vol. 51, no. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 155–62. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.019.
Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE, Kamal AH, Walling AM, Ersek M, Norton SA. Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):155–162.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Pain Symptom Manage

DOI

EISSN

1873-6513

Publication Date

February 2016

Volume

51

Issue

2

Start / End Page

155 / 162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Design
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Palliative Care
  • Humans
  • Hospice Care
  • Family
  • Biomedical Research