Skip to main content

Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fudim, M; Brown, CL; Davis, ME; Djunaidi, M; Danter, MR; Harrell, FE; Stulak, JM; Haglund, NA; Maltais, S
Published in: ASAIO J
2016

Driveline infections (DLI) are a cause of morbidity after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. Because driveline trauma contributes to DLI, we assessed whether intraoperative placement of a temporary external anchoring suture (EAS) influenced DLI rate. We analyzed 161 consecutive patients with CF-LVAD (HMII 82; HW 79) implantation. Two groups were defined: placement of EAS (n = 85) or No EAS (n = 76). For NO EAS patients, the driveline was permanently anchored internally to the rectus fascia. Cox proportional analysis was performed to assess the effect of EAS on time to first confirmed DLI. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (all p = 0.3). Mean follow-up time was 0.93 years. A total of 18 (11.1%) patients developed confirmed culture positive DLI, with "first infection" rate of 0.13 events/year. Mean time to confirmed DLI was 0.69 years. Driveline infection was less likely (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.28, 0.95 confidence interval [CI] = 0.06-1.25, p = 0.056) to occur in NO EAS (2/18) then in EAS (16/18). Confirmed DLI was comparable between device types (p = 0.3). Multivariable regression adjusted for age, BMI, blood product use, device type, and diabetes showed equivocal effect of EAS (HR = 0.33, 0.95 CI = 0.07-1.54, p = 0.12). Patients with a temporary EAS may have an increased risk of confirmed DLI after device implantation.

Duke Scholars

Published In

ASAIO J

DOI

EISSN

1538-943X

Publication Date

2016

Volume

62

Issue

3

Start / End Page

291 / 296

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sutures
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fudim, M., Brown, C. L., Davis, M. E., Djunaidi, M., Danter, M. R., Harrell, F. E., … Maltais, S. (2016). Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J, 62(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000346
Fudim, Marat, Christopher L. Brown, Mary E. Davis, Monica Djunaidi, Matthew R. Danter, Frank E. Harrell, John M. Stulak, Nicholas A. Haglund, and Simon Maltais. “Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device.ASAIO J 62, no. 3 (2016): 291–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000346.
Fudim M, Brown CL, Davis ME, Djunaidi M, Danter MR, Harrell FE, et al. Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2016;62(3):291–6.
Fudim, Marat, et al. “Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device.ASAIO J, vol. 62, no. 3, 2016, pp. 291–96. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000346.
Fudim M, Brown CL, Davis ME, Djunaidi M, Danter MR, Harrell FE, Stulak JM, Haglund NA, Maltais S. Driveline Infection Risk with Utilization of a Temporary External Anchoring Suture After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device. ASAIO J. 2016;62(3):291–296.

Published In

ASAIO J

DOI

EISSN

1538-943X

Publication Date

2016

Volume

62

Issue

3

Start / End Page

291 / 296

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sutures
  • Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Female