Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mühlbacher, A; Johnson, FR
Published in: Appl Health Econ Health Policy
June 2016

Stated-preference methods increasingly are used to quantify preferences in health economics, health technology assessment, benefit-risk analysis and health services research. The objective of stated-preference studies is to acquire information about trade-off preferences among treatment outcomes, prioritization of clinical decision criteria, likely uptake or adherence to healthcare products and acceptability of healthcare services or policies. A widely accepted approach to eliciting preferences is discrete-choice experiments. Patient, physician, insurant or general-public respondents choose among constructed, experimentally controlled alternatives described by decision-relevant features or attributes. Attributes can represent complete health states, sets of treatment outcomes or characteristics of a healthcare system. The observed pattern of choice reveals how different respondents or groups of respondents implicitly weigh, value and assess different characteristics of treatments, products or services. An important advantage of choice experiments is their foundation in microeconomic utility theory. This conceptual framework provides tests of internal validity, guidance for statistical analysis of latent preference structures, and testable behavioural hypotheses. Choice experiments require expertise in survey-research methods, random-utility theory, experimental design and advanced statistical analysis. This paper should be understood as an introduction to setting up a basic experiment rather than an exhaustive critique of the latest findings and procedures. Where appropriate, we have identified topics of active research where a broad consensus has not yet been established.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

DOI

EISSN

1179-1896

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

253 / 266

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Research Design
  • Patient Preference
  • Humans
  • Health Services Research
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Financing, Personal
  • Decision Making
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Choice Behavior
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mühlbacher, A., & Johnson, F. R. (2016). Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 14(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7
Mühlbacher, Axel, and F Reed Johnson. “Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.Appl Health Econ Health Policy 14, no. 3 (June 2016): 253–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
Mühlbacher A, Johnson FR. Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253–66.
Mühlbacher, Axel, and F. Reed Johnson. “Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.Appl Health Econ Health Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, June 2016, pp. 253–66. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
Mühlbacher A, Johnson FR. Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253–266.
Journal cover image

Published In

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

DOI

EISSN

1179-1896

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

253 / 266

Location

New Zealand

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Research Design
  • Patient Preference
  • Humans
  • Health Services Research
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Financing, Personal
  • Decision Making
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Choice Behavior