Skip to main content

Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chin, CT; Boden, WE; Roe, MT; Neely, B; Neely, ML; Leiva-Pons, JL; Corbalán, R; Gottlieb, S; Dalby, AJ; Armstrong, PW; Prabhakaran, D ...
Published in: Heart
August 1, 2016

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether prior clopidogrel influenced long-term ischaemic and bleeding risks and modified the randomised treatment effect of clopidogrel versus prasugrel among medically managed patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Medically managed patients with ACS in the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial were randomised to clopidogrel versus prasugrel (plus aspirin), stratified by prior clopidogrel use. From the analysis population (n=8927), we compared two groups: 'clopidogrel in-hospital (n=6513)' (clopidogrel started ≤72 h of presentation for index ACS event) and 'prior-clopidogrel (n=2414)' (on clopidogrel ≥5 days before index hospitalisation). Treatment-related differences in ischaemic (all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and the composite of CV death/MI/stroke) and bleeding outcomes (severe/life-threatening or moderate bleeding events based on Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) criteria) through 30 months were analysed between patients in the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with 'clopidogrel in-hospital,' 'prior clopidogrel' patients were younger (median 64 years vs 66 years, p<0.001), more likely to have prior CV events/revascularisation, and had a higher frequency of CV death, MI or stroke through 30 months (20.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.002), with no difference in bleeding events (2.3% vs 3.4%, p=0.50). Randomised treatment effect (prasugrel vs clopidogrel) was similar for ischaemic and bleeding outcomes in both groups (all pinteraction>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving clopidogrel before admission for ACS and subsequently treated only medically are at higher risk for CV events versus those not previously receiving clopidogrel. More potent antiplatelet inhibition with prasugrel versus clopidogrel did not significantly reduce this risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00699998.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Heart

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

Publication Date

August 1, 2016

Volume

102

Issue

15

Start / End Page

1221 / 1229

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Ticlopidine
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prasugrel Hydrochloride
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chin, C. T., Boden, W. E., Roe, M. T., Neely, B., Neely, M. L., Leiva-Pons, J. L., … Schiele, F. (2016). Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients. Heart, 102(15), 1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308840
Chin, Chee Tang, William E. Boden, Matthew T. Roe, Benjamin Neely, Megan L. Neely, Jose L. Leiva-Pons, Ramón Corbalán, et al. “Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients.Heart 102, no. 15 (August 1, 2016): 1221–29. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308840.
Chin CT, Boden WE, Roe MT, Neely B, Neely ML, Leiva-Pons JL, et al. Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients. Heart. 2016 Aug 1;102(15):1221–9.
Chin, Chee Tang, et al. “Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients.Heart, vol. 102, no. 15, Aug. 2016, pp. 1221–29. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308840.
Chin CT, Boden WE, Roe MT, Neely B, Neely ML, Leiva-Pons JL, Corbalán R, Gottlieb S, Dalby AJ, Armstrong PW, Prabhakaran D, Fox KAA, White HD, Ohman EM, Winters KJ, Schiele F. Effect of prior clopidogrel use on outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients. Heart. 2016 Aug 1;102(15):1221–1229.

Published In

Heart

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

Publication Date

August 1, 2016

Volume

102

Issue

15

Start / End Page

1221 / 1229

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Ticlopidine
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prasugrel Hydrochloride
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Myocardial Infarction