Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Overman, MJ; Morris, V; Kee, B; Fogelman, D; Xiao, L; Eng, C; Dasari, A; Shroff, R; Mazard, T; Shaw, K; Vilar, E; Raghav, K; Shureiqi, I ...
Published in: Ann Oncol
June 2016

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of multiple enrichment biomarkers into prospective clinical trials is an active area of investigation, but the factors that determine clinical trial enrollment following a molecular prescreening program have not been assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were offered screening in the Assessment of Targeted Therapies Against Colorectal Cancer (ATTACC) program to identify eligibility for companion phase I or II clinical trials with a therapy targeted to an aberration detected in the patient, based on testing by immunohistochemistry, targeted gene sequencing panels, and CpG island methylation phenotype assays. RESULTS: Between August 2010 and December 2013, 484 patients were enrolled, 458 (95%) had a biomarker result, and 157 (32%) were enrolled on a clinical trial (92 on biomarker-selected and 65 on nonbiomarker selected). Of the 458 patients with a biomarker result, enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials was ninefold higher for predefined ATTACC-companion clinical trials as opposed to nonpredefined biomarker-selected clinical trials, 17.9% versus 2%, P < 0.001. Factors that correlated positively with trial enrollment in multivariate analysis were higher performance status, older age, lack of standard of care therapy, established patient at MD Anderson, and the presence of an eligible biomarker for an ATTACC-companion study. Early molecular screening did result in a higher rate of patients with remaining standard of care therapy enrolling on ATTACC-companion clinical trials, 45.1%, in contrast to nonpredefined clinical trials, 22.7%; odds ratio 3.1, P = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Though early molecular prescreening for predefined clinical trials resulted in an increase rate of trial enrollment of nonrefractory patients, the majority of patients enrolled on clinical trials were refractory to standard of care therapy. Within molecular prescreening programs, tailoring screening for preidentified and open clinical trials, temporally linking screening to treatment and optimizing both patient and physician engagement are efforts likely to improve enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: The study NCT number is NCT01196130.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1569-8041

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

27

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1068 / 1074

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Patient Selection
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasm Proteins
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Fluorouracil
  • Female
  • Eligibility Determination
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Overman, M. J., Morris, V., Kee, B., Fogelman, D., Xiao, L., Eng, C., … Kopetz, S. (2016). Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials. Ann Oncol, 27(6), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw073
Overman, M. J., V. Morris, B. Kee, D. Fogelman, L. Xiao, C. Eng, A. Dasari, et al. “Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials.Ann Oncol 27, no. 6 (June 2016): 1068–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw073.
Overman MJ, Morris V, Kee B, Fogelman D, Xiao L, Eng C, et al. Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1068–74.
Overman, M. J., et al. “Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials.Ann Oncol, vol. 27, no. 6, June 2016, pp. 1068–74. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw073.
Overman MJ, Morris V, Kee B, Fogelman D, Xiao L, Eng C, Dasari A, Shroff R, Mazard T, Shaw K, Vilar E, Raghav K, Shureiqi I, Liang L, Mills GB, Wolff RA, Hamilton S, Meric-Bernstam F, Abbruzzese J, Morris J, Maru D, Kopetz S. Utility of a molecular prescreening program in advanced colorectal cancer for enrollment on biomarker-selected clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1068–1074.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ann Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1569-8041

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

27

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1068 / 1074

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Patient Selection
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasm Proteins
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Fluorouracil
  • Female
  • Eligibility Determination