Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments

Publication ,  Journal Article
Conlon, DE; Lind, EA; Lissak, RI
Published in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology
January 1, 1989

It has generally been assumed that increases in the concrete outcomes of a procedure will result in judgments of greater procedural and distributive fairness, but research on this topic has been inconsistent. Using a classic procedural justice paradigm (Walker, LaTour, Lind, &. Thibaut, 1974), the experiment tested the effects of four levels of outcome. Forty‐eight male and female undergraduates were led to believe that their team had been wrongfully charged with cheating in a business simulation game. An adversary adjudication was held, purportedly to resolve the charge. The outcome of the adjudication was confiscation of all, two thirds, one third, or none of the subject's monetary winnings from the game. Both procedural and distributive fairness measures showed dear nonlinear outcome effects. The relationship between outcomes and both fairness measures showed some evidence of being nonmonotonic as well: A two‐thirds loss resulted in less favorable reactions than did a total loss. Ratings on other scales suggest that the nonlinear effects are due to beliefs that the judge did not fully consider the evidence in the two‐thirds loss and one‐third loss conditions. The discussion focuses on the theoretical implications of the findings for procedural justice and social exchange processes and the practical implications for conflict resolution procedure. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

DOI

EISSN

1559-1816

ISSN

0021-9029

Publication Date

January 1, 1989

Volume

19

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1085 / 1099

Related Subject Headings

  • Social Psychology
  • 5205 Social and personality psychology
  • 4206 Public health
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1505 Marketing
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Conlon, D. E., Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. (1989). Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(13), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01241.x
Conlon, D. E., E. A. Lind, and R. I. Lissak. “Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19, no. 13 (January 1, 1989): 1085–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01241.x.
Conlon DE, Lind EA, Lissak RI. Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1989 Jan 1;19(13):1085–99.
Conlon, D. E., et al. “Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 19, no. 13, Jan. 1989, pp. 1085–99. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01241.x.
Conlon DE, Lind EA, Lissak RI. Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1989 Jan 1;19(13):1085–1099.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

DOI

EISSN

1559-1816

ISSN

0021-9029

Publication Date

January 1, 1989

Volume

19

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1085 / 1099

Related Subject Headings

  • Social Psychology
  • 5205 Social and personality psychology
  • 4206 Public health
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1505 Marketing