Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Crossley, GH; Sorrentino, RA; Exner, DV; Merliss, AD; Tobias, SM; Martin, DO; Augostini, R; Piccini, JP; Schaerf, R; Li, S; Miller, CT; Adler, SW
Published in: Heart Rhythm
June 2016

BACKGROUND: The Medtronic model 4195 (StarFix) left ventricular lead is an active fixation lead that provides additional support within the coronary sinus (CS) via deployable lobes. While this lead has been shown to have excellent stability within the CS, concerns about its extractability have been raised. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the extraction of the model 4195 lead vs other Medtronic CS leads in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients undergoing extraction of this and other CS leads for standard indications were prospectively enrolled and studied. The primary outcomes of interest were the removal success rates and associated complication rates. Patients were followed for a month postprocedure. RESULTS: The overall left ventricular lead extraction success rate was 97.6% (n = 205). Among 40 patients with chronic model 4195 leads, there were 37 successful extractions (92.5%) as compared to 98.8% for the 165 non-4195 leads. However, in 2 of the 3 StarFix lead extraction failures, standard extraction techniques were not used. All 10 of the model 4195 leads that had been implanted for less than 6 months were extracted without incident. CONCLUSION: In this largest study of CS lead extractions published to date, the overall success rate of the extraction of chronically implanted CS leads is high and the complication rate is similar in these lead models. The extraction of the model 4195 lead is clearly more challenging, but it can be accomplished in high-volume extraction centers with experienced operators. It is recommended that the model 4195 lead be extracted by experienced operators.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Heart Rhythm

DOI

EISSN

1556-3871

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

13

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1253 / 1259

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Equipment Design
  • Device Removal
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Crossley, G. H., Sorrentino, R. A., Exner, D. V., Merliss, A. D., Tobias, S. M., Martin, D. O., … Adler, S. W. (2016). Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads. Heart Rhythm, 13(6), 1253–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.031
Crossley, George H., Robert A. Sorrentino, Derek V. Exner, Andrew D. Merliss, Serge M. Tobias, David O. Martin, Ralph Augostini, et al. “Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads.Heart Rhythm 13, no. 6 (June 2016): 1253–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.031.
Crossley GH, Sorrentino RA, Exner DV, Merliss AD, Tobias SM, Martin DO, et al. Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1253–9.
Crossley, George H., et al. “Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads.Heart Rhythm, vol. 13, no. 6, June 2016, pp. 1253–59. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.031.
Crossley GH, Sorrentino RA, Exner DV, Merliss AD, Tobias SM, Martin DO, Augostini R, Piccini JP, Schaerf R, Li S, Miller CT, Adler SW. Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1253–1259.
Journal cover image

Published In

Heart Rhythm

DOI

EISSN

1556-3871

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

13

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1253 / 1259

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Equipment Design
  • Device Removal