Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kelly, K; Grau-Sepulveda, MV; Goldstein, BA; Spratt, SE; Wolfley, A; Hatfield, V; Murphy, M; Jones, E; Granger, BB
Published in: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
2016

OBJECTIVE: Medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) improves glycemic control and is associated with reduced adverse clinical events, and accurately assessing adherence assessment is important. We aimed to determine agreement between two commonly used adherence measures-the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) and direct observation of medication use by nurse practitioners (NPs) during home visits-and determine the relationship between each measure and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated agreement between adherence measures in the Southeastern Diabetes Initiative (SEDI) prospective clinical intervention home visit cohort, which included high-risk patients (n=430) in 4 SEDI-participating counties. The mean age was 58.7 (SD 11.6) years. The majority were white (n=210, 48.8%), female (n=236, 54.9%), living with a partner (n=316, 74.5%), and insured by Medicare/Medicaid (n=361, 84.0%). Medication adherence was dichotomized to 'adherent' or 'not adherent' using established cut-points. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ coefficient. Relationships among adherence measures and HbA1c were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and c-statistics. RESULTS: Fewer patients (n=261, 61%) were considered adherent by self-reported MMAS score versus the NP-observed score (n=338; 79%). Inter-rater agreement between the two adherence measures was fair (κ=0.24; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.33; p<0.0001). Higher adherence was significantly associated with lower HbA1c levels for both measures, yet discrimination was weak (c-statistic=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between self-reported versus directly observed medication adherence was lower than expected. Though scores for both adherence measures were significantly associated with HbA1c, neither discriminated well for discrete levels of HbA1c.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care

DOI

ISSN

2052-4897

Publication Date

2016

Volume

4

Issue

1

Start / End Page

e000182

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kelly, K., Grau-Sepulveda, M. V., Goldstein, B. A., Spratt, S. E., Wolfley, A., Hatfield, V., … Granger, B. B. (2016). The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 4(1), e000182. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000182
Kelly, Katherine, Maria V. Grau-Sepulveda, Benjamin A. Goldstein, Susan E. Spratt, Anne Wolfley, Vicki Hatfield, Monica Murphy, Ellen Jones, and Bradi B. Granger. “The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 4, no. 1 (2016): e000182. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000182.
Kelly K, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Goldstein BA, Spratt SE, Wolfley A, Hatfield V, et al. The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4(1):e000182.
Kelly, Katherine, et al. “The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, vol. 4, no. 1, 2016, p. e000182. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000182.
Kelly K, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Goldstein BA, Spratt SE, Wolfley A, Hatfield V, Murphy M, Jones E, Granger BB. The agreement of patient-reported versus observed medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4(1):e000182.

Published In

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care

DOI

ISSN

2052-4897

Publication Date

2016

Volume

4

Issue

1

Start / End Page

e000182

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 4206 Public health
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences