Skip to main content

Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kennerly, S; Boss, L; Yap, TL; Batchelor-Murphy, M; Horn, SD; Barrett, R; Bergstrom, N
Published in: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
September 2015

The Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk(©) is a screening tool to determine overall risk of pressure ulcer development and estimate severity of specific risk factors for individual residents. Nurses often use the Braden nutrition subscale to screen nursing home (NH) residents for nutritional risk, and then recommend a more comprehensive nutritional assessment as indicated. Secondary data analysis from the Turn for Ulcer ReductioN (TURN) study's investigation of U.S. and Canadian NH residents (n = 690) considered at moderate or high pressure ulcer (PrU) risk was used to evaluate the subscale's utility for identifying nutritional intake risk factors. Associations were examined between Braden Nutritional Risk subscale screening, dietary intake (mean % meal intake and by meal timing, mean number of protein servings, protein sources, % intake of supplements and snacks), weight outcomes, and new PrU incidence. Of moderate and high PrU risk residents, 61.9% and 59.2% ate a mean meal % of <75. Fewer than 18% overall ate <50% of meals or refused meals. No significant differences were observed in weight differences by nutrition subscale risk or in mean number protein servings per meal (1.4 (SD = 0.58) versus 1.3 (SD = 0.53)) for moderate versus high PrU risk residents. The nutrition subscale approximates subsequent estimated dietary intake and can provide insight into meal intake patterns for those at either moderate or high PrU risk. Findings support the Braden Scale's use as a preliminary screening method to identify focused areas for potential intervention.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

DOI

EISSN

2227-9032

ISSN

2227-9032

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

3

Issue

4

Start / End Page

879 / 897

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kennerly, S., Boss, L., Yap, T. L., Batchelor-Murphy, M., Horn, S. D., Barrett, R., & Bergstrom, N. (2015). Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 3(4), 879–897. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3040879
Kennerly, Susan, Lisa Boss, Tracey L. Yap, Melissa Batchelor-Murphy, Susan D. Horn, Ryan Barrett, and Nancy Bergstrom. “Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 3, no. 4 (September 2015): 879–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare3040879.
Kennerly S, Boss L, Yap TL, Batchelor-Murphy M, Horn SD, Barrett R, et al. Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2015 Sep;3(4):879–97.
Kennerly, Susan, et al. “Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 3, no. 4, Sept. 2015, pp. 879–97. Epmc, doi:10.3390/healthcare3040879.
Kennerly S, Boss L, Yap TL, Batchelor-Murphy M, Horn SD, Barrett R, Bergstrom N. Utility of Braden Scale Nutrition Subscale Ratings as an Indicator of Dietary Intake and Weight Outcomes among Nursing Home Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2015 Sep;3(4):879–897.

Published In

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

DOI

EISSN

2227-9032

ISSN

2227-9032

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

3

Issue

4

Start / End Page

879 / 897

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences