Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?
Publication
, Journal Article
Caveney, BJ
Published in: N C Med J
2016
The health care system is slowly evolving from fee-for-service care to other forms of payment. Pay-for-performance contracts based on quality, patient satisfaction, and utilization are an important development along the continuum. The metrics are not perfect and do not always nudge clinicians to improve their performance, but many outcomes are likely to improve.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
N C Med J
DOI
ISSN
0029-2559
Publication Date
2016
Volume
77
Issue
4
Start / End Page
265 / 268
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Reimbursement, Incentive
- Quality of Health Care
- Patient Satisfaction
- North Carolina
- Motivation
- Humans
- Health Policy
- Health Care Reform
- Forecasting
- Contract Services
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Caveney, B. J. (2016). Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J, 77(4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.4.265
Caveney, Brian J. “Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?” N C Med J 77, no. 4 (2016): 265–68. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.4.265.
Caveney BJ. Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J. 2016;77(4):265–8.
Caveney, Brian J. “Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?” N C Med J, vol. 77, no. 4, 2016, pp. 265–68. Pubmed, doi:10.18043/ncm.77.4.265.
Caveney BJ. Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J. 2016;77(4):265–268.
Published In
N C Med J
DOI
ISSN
0029-2559
Publication Date
2016
Volume
77
Issue
4
Start / End Page
265 / 268
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Reimbursement, Incentive
- Quality of Health Care
- Patient Satisfaction
- North Carolina
- Motivation
- Humans
- Health Policy
- Health Care Reform
- Forecasting
- Contract Services