Skip to main content

Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Caveney, BJ
Published in: N C Med J
2016

The health care system is slowly evolving from fee-for-service care to other forms of payment. Pay-for-performance contracts based on quality, patient satisfaction, and utilization are an important development along the continuum. The metrics are not perfect and do not always nudge clinicians to improve their performance, but many outcomes are likely to improve.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

N C Med J

DOI

ISSN

0029-2559

Publication Date

2016

Volume

77

Issue

4

Start / End Page

265 / 268

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reimbursement, Incentive
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • North Carolina
  • Motivation
  • Humans
  • Health Policy
  • Health Care Reform
  • Forecasting
  • Contract Services
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Caveney, B. J. (2016). Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J, 77(4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.4.265
Caveney, Brian J. “Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?N C Med J 77, no. 4 (2016): 265–68. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.4.265.
Caveney BJ. Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J. 2016;77(4):265–8.
Caveney, Brian J. “Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup?N C Med J, vol. 77, no. 4, 2016, pp. 265–68. Pubmed, doi:10.18043/ncm.77.4.265.
Caveney BJ. Pay-for-Performance Incentives: Holy Grail or Sippy Cup? N C Med J. 2016;77(4):265–268.

Published In

N C Med J

DOI

ISSN

0029-2559

Publication Date

2016

Volume

77

Issue

4

Start / End Page

265 / 268

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reimbursement, Incentive
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • North Carolina
  • Motivation
  • Humans
  • Health Policy
  • Health Care Reform
  • Forecasting
  • Contract Services