Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen.
Publication
, Journal Article
Riaz, H; Krasuski, RA
Published in: Am J Med
March 2017
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Am J Med
DOI
EISSN
1555-7162
Publication Date
March 2017
Volume
130
Issue
3
Start / End Page
245 / 246
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Humans
- General & Internal Medicine
- Electronic Health Records
- Clinical Competence
- Algorithms
- 42 Health sciences
- 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Riaz, H., & Krasuski, R. A. (2017). Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen. Am J Med, 130(3), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.035
Riaz, Haris, and Richard A. Krasuski. “Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen.” Am J Med 130, no. 3 (March 2017): 245–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.035.
Riaz H, Krasuski RA. Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen. Am J Med. 2017 Mar;130(3):245–6.
Riaz, Haris, and Richard A. Krasuski. “Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen.” Am J Med, vol. 130, no. 3, Mar. 2017, pp. 245–46. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.035.
Riaz H, Krasuski RA. Best Practice Advisories Should Not Replace Good Clinical Acumen. Am J Med. 2017 Mar;130(3):245–246.
Published In
Am J Med
DOI
EISSN
1555-7162
Publication Date
March 2017
Volume
130
Issue
3
Start / End Page
245 / 246
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Humans
- General & Internal Medicine
- Electronic Health Records
- Clinical Competence
- Algorithms
- 42 Health sciences
- 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences