Skip to main content

WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Samei, E
Published in: Med Phys
June 2016

Prospective quality management techniques, long used by engineering and industry, have become a growing aspect of efforts to improve quality management and safety in healthcare. These techniques are of particular interest to medical physics as scope and complexity of clinical practice continue to grow, thus making the prescriptive methods we have used harder to apply and potentially less effective for our interconnected and highly complex healthcare enterprise, especially in imaging and radiation oncology. An essential part of most prospective methods is the need to assess the various risks associated with problems, failures, errors, and design flaws in our systems. We therefore begin with an overview of risk assessment methodologies used in healthcare and industry and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. The rationale for use of process mapping, failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA) by TG-100 will be described, as well as suggestions for the way forward. This is followed by discussion of radiation oncology specific risk assessment strategies and issues, including the TG-100 effort to evaluate IMRT and other ways to think about risk in the context of radiotherapy. Incident learning systems, local as well as the ASTRO/AAPM ROILS system, can also be useful in the risk assessment process. Finally, risk in the context of medical imaging will be discussed. Radiation (and other) safety considerations, as well as lack of quality and certainty all contribute to the potential risks associated with suboptimal imaging. The goal of this session is to summarize a wide variety of risk analysis methods and issues to give the medical physicist access to tools which can better define risks (and their importance) which we work to mitigate with both prescriptive and prospective risk-based quality management methods. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Description of risk assessment methodologies used in healthcare and industry 2. Discussion of radiation oncology-specific risk assessment strategies and issues 3. Evaluation of risk in the context of medical imaging and image quality E. Samei: Research grants from Siemens and GE.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

2473-4209

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

43

Issue

6

Start / End Page

3807

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Samei, E. (2016). WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging. Med Phys, 43(6), 3807. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4957800
Samei, E. “WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging.Med Phys 43, no. 6 (June 2016): 3807. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4957800.
Samei E. WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging. Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):3807.
Samei, E. “WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging.Med Phys, vol. 43, no. 6, June 2016, p. 3807. Pubmed, doi:10.1118/1.4957800.
Samei E. WE-B-BRC-03: Risk in the Context of Medical Imaging. Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):3807.

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

2473-4209

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

43

Issue

6

Start / End Page

3807

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences