Skip to main content

SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gardner, S; Studenski, M; Giaddui, T; Cui, Y; Galvin, J; Yu, Y; Xiao, Y
Published in: Med Phys
June 2014

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality and imaging dose of the Varian TrueBeam OBIv.1.5 CBCT system in a clinical adaptive radiation therapy environment, simulated by changing phantom thickness. METHODS: Various OBI CBCT protocols(Head, Pelvis, Thorax, Spotlight) were used to acquire images of Catphan504 phantom(nominal phantom thickness and 10 cm additional phantom thickness). The images were analyzed for low contrast detectability(CNR), uniformity(UI), and HU sensitivity. These results were compared to the same image sets for planning CT(pCT)(GE LightSpeed 16- slice). Imaging dose measurements were performed with Gafchromic XRQA2 film for various OBI protocols (Pelvis, Thorax, Spotlight) in a pelvic-sized phantom(nominal thickness and 4cm additional thickness). Dose measurements were acquired in the interior and at the surface of the phantom. RESULTS: The nominal CNR[additional thickness CNR] for OBI was-Pelvis:1.45[0.81],Thorax:0.86[0.48], Spotlight:0.67[0.39],Head:0.28 [0.10]. The nominal CNR[additional thickness CNR] for pCT was- Pelvis:0.87[0.41],Head:0.60[0.22]. The nominal UI[additional thickness UI] for OBI was-Pelvis:11.5[24.1],Thorax:17.0[20.6], Spotlight:23.2[23.2], Head:15.6[59.9]. The nominal UI[additional thickness UI] for pCT was- Pelvis:9.2[8.6],Head:2.1[2.9]. The HU difference(averaged over all material inserts) between nominal and additional thickness scans for OBI: 8.26HU(Pelvis), 33.39HU(Thorax), 178.98HU(Head), 108.20HU (Spotlight); for pCT: 16.00HU(Pelvis), 19.85HU(Head). Uncertainties in electron density were calculated based on HU values with varying phantom thickness. Average electron-density deviations (ρ(water)=1)for GE-Pelvis, GE-Head, OBI-Pelvis, OBI-Thorax, OBI-Spotlight, and OBI-Head were: 0.0182, 0.0180, 0.0058, 0.0478, 0.2750, and 0.3115, respectively. The average phantom interior dose was(OBI-nominal):2.35cGy(Pelvis), 0.60cGy(Thorax), 1.87cGy(Spotlight); OBI-increased thickness: 1.77cGy(Pelvis), 0.43cGy(Thorax), 1.53cGy (Spotlight). Average surface dose(OBI-nominal): 2.29cGy(Pelvis), 0.56cGy(Thorax), 1.79cGy (Spotlight); OBI-increased thickness: 1.94cGy(Pelvis), 0.48cGy(Thorax), 1.47cGy (Spotlight). CONCLUSION: The OBI-Pelvis protocol offered comparable CNR and HU constancy to pCT for each geometry; other protocols, particularly Spotlight and Head, exhibited lower HU constancy and CNR. The uniformity of pCT was superior to OBI for all protocols. CNR and UI were degraded for both systems/scan types with increased thickness. The OBI interior dose decreased by approximately 30% with additional thickness. This work was funded, in part, under a grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health. The Department of Health specifically declaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

June 2014

Volume

41

Issue

6

Start / End Page

191

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gardner, S., Studenski, M., Giaddui, T., Cui, Y., Galvin, J., Yu, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2014). SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment. Med Phys, 41(6), 191. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4888205
Gardner, S., M. Studenski, T. Giaddui, Y. Cui, J. Galvin, Y. Yu, and Y. Xiao. “SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment.Med Phys 41, no. 6 (June 2014): 191. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4888205.
Gardner S, Studenski M, Giaddui T, Cui Y, Galvin J, Yu Y, et al. SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment. Med Phys. 2014 Jun;41(6):191.
Gardner, S., et al. “SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment.Med Phys, vol. 41, no. 6, June 2014, p. 191. Pubmed, doi:10.1118/1.4888205.
Gardner S, Studenski M, Giaddui T, Cui Y, Galvin J, Yu Y, Xiao Y. SU-E-J-152: Evaluation of TrueBeam OBI V. 1.5 CBCT Performance in An Adaptive RT Environment. Med Phys. 2014 Jun;41(6):191.

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

June 2014

Volume

41

Issue

6

Start / End Page

191

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences