Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wilson, WT; Miller, GL; Mcdougall, LL; Erdman, WA; Morris, JS; Preminger, GM
Published in: Journal of Endourology
January 1, 1990

Morphologic changes of the kidney after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) have been demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be present in as many as 85% of patients treated with first-generation electrohydraulic lithotripters. We compared the acute renal morphologic changes produced by a second-generation piezoelectric machine (Wolf Piezolith 2300) with those of an electrohydraulic lithotripter (Dornier HM3). All patients were studied with renal MRI scans 24 hours after lithotripsy and then serially with repeat MRI scans at 2 weeks and at 1 month if any changes were noted on the prior study. Only 1 of 20 (5 %) of patients treated on the Wolf Piezolith 2300 showed any changes by MRI, the change consisting of localized perinephric edema present on the scan at 24 hours that resolved spontaneously by 2 weeks. In contrast, 2 of 4 of the patients treated on a Dornier HM3 showed specific renal changes, including subcapsular fluid collections and loss of corticomedullary demarcation, and all 4 had acutely increased renal volume on the treated side. These findings suggest that piezoelectric lithotripsy may be less damaging acutely to the renal parenchyma and surrounding tissues than electrohydraulic machines. © 1990, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Endourology

DOI

EISSN

1557-900X

ISSN

0892-7790

Publication Date

January 1, 1990

Volume

4

Issue

4

Start / End Page

407 / 413

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wilson, W. T., Miller, G. L., Mcdougall, L. L., Erdman, W. A., Morris, J. S., & Preminger, G. M. (1990). Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology, 4(4), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1990.4.407
Wilson, W. T., G. L. Miller, L. L. Mcdougall, W. A. Erdman, J. S. Morris, and G. M. Preminger. “Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy.” Journal of Endourology 4, no. 4 (January 1, 1990): 407–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1990.4.407.
Wilson WT, Miller GL, Mcdougall LL, Erdman WA, Morris JS, Preminger GM. Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology. 1990 Jan 1;4(4):407–13.
Wilson, W. T., et al. “Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy.” Journal of Endourology, vol. 4, no. 4, Jan. 1990, pp. 407–13. Scopus, doi:10.1089/end.1990.4.407.
Wilson WT, Miller GL, Mcdougall LL, Erdman WA, Morris JS, Preminger GM. Renal Magnetic Resonance Appearance After Piezoelectric and Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology. 1990 Jan 1;4(4):407–413.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of Endourology

DOI

EISSN

1557-900X

ISSN

0892-7790

Publication Date

January 1, 1990

Volume

4

Issue

4

Start / End Page

407 / 413

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences