Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A critical analysis of species selection and high vs. low-input silviculture on establishment success and early productivity of model short-rotation wood-energy cropping systems

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fischer, M; Kelley, AM; Ward, EJ; Boone, JD; Ashley, EM; Domec, JC; Williamson, JC; King, JS
Published in: Biomass and Bioenergy
January 1, 2017

Most research on bioenergy short rotation woody crops (SRWC) has been dedicated to the genera Populus and Salix. These species generally require relatively high-input culture, including intensive weed competition control, which increases costs and environmental externalities. Widespread native early successional species, characterized by high productivity and good coppicing ability, may be better adapted to local environmental stresses and therefore could offer alternative low-input bioenergy production systems. To test this concept, we established a three-year experiment comparing a widely-used hybrid poplar (Populus nigra × P. maximowiczii, clone ‘NM6’) to two native species, American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis L.) and tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) grown under contrasting weed and pest control at a coastal plain site in eastern North Carolina, USA. Mean cumulative aboveground wood production was significantly greater in sycamore, with yields of 46.6 Mg ha−1under high-inputs and 32.7 Mg ha−1under low-input culture, which rivaled the high-input NM6 yield of 32.9 Mg ha−1. NM6 under low-input management provided noncompetitive yield of 6.2 Mg ha−1. Sycamore also showed superiority in survival, biomass increment, weed resistance, treatment convergence, and within-stand uniformity. All are important characteristics for a bioenergy feedstock crop species, leading to reliable establishment and efficient biomass production. Poor performance in all traits was found for tuliptree, with a maximum yield of 1.2 Mg ha−1, suggesting this native species is a poor choice for SRWC. We conclude that careful species selection beyond the conventionally used genera may enhance reliability and decrease negative environmental impacts of the bioenergy biomass production sector.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Biomass and Bioenergy

DOI

EISSN

1873-2909

ISSN

0961-9534

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

98

Start / End Page

214 / 227

Related Subject Headings

  • Energy
  • 40 Engineering
  • 30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
  • 10 Technology
  • 09 Engineering
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fischer, M., Kelley, A. M., Ward, E. J., Boone, J. D., Ashley, E. M., Domec, J. C., … King, J. S. (2017). A critical analysis of species selection and high vs. low-input silviculture on establishment success and early productivity of model short-rotation wood-energy cropping systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 98, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.027
Fischer, M., A. M. Kelley, E. J. Ward, J. D. Boone, E. M. Ashley, J. C. Domec, J. C. Williamson, and J. S. King. “A critical analysis of species selection and high vs. low-input silviculture on establishment success and early productivity of model short-rotation wood-energy cropping systems.” Biomass and Bioenergy 98 (January 1, 2017): 214–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.027.
Fischer, M., et al. “A critical analysis of species selection and high vs. low-input silviculture on establishment success and early productivity of model short-rotation wood-energy cropping systems.” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 98, Jan. 2017, pp. 214–27. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.027.
Fischer M, Kelley AM, Ward EJ, Boone JD, Ashley EM, Domec JC, Williamson JC, King JS. A critical analysis of species selection and high vs. low-input silviculture on establishment success and early productivity of model short-rotation wood-energy cropping systems. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2017 Jan 1;98:214–227.
Journal cover image

Published In

Biomass and Bioenergy

DOI

EISSN

1873-2909

ISSN

0961-9534

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

98

Start / End Page

214 / 227

Related Subject Headings

  • Energy
  • 40 Engineering
  • 30 Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences
  • 10 Technology
  • 09 Engineering
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences