Skip to main content

Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bangalore, S; Toklu, B; Kotwal, A; Volodarskiy, A; Sharma, S; Kirtane, AJ; Feit, F
Published in: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
November 2014

To investigate the relative benefits of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin(LMWH), fondaparinux, and bivalirudin as treatment options for patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Mixed treatment comparison and direct comparison meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors.A search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized trials comparing unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor(GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor), unfractionated heparin, bivalirudin, fondaparinux, or LMWH plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor for patients undergoing primary PCI.The primary efficacy outcome was short term (in hospital or within 30 days) major adverse cardiovascular event; the primary safety outcome was short term major bleeding.We identified 22 randomized trials that enrolled 22,434 patients. In the mixed treatment comparison models, when compared with unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor, unfractionated heparin was associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (relative risk 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.84), as were bivalirudin (relative risk 1.34 (1.01 to 1.78)) and fondaparinux (1.78 (1.01 to 3.14)). LMWH plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor showed highest treatment efficacy, followed (in order) by unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin, unfractionated heparin, and fondaparinux. Bivalirudin was associated with lower major bleeding risk compared with unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor (relative risk 0.47 (0.30 to 0.74)) or unfractionated heparin (0.58 (0.37 to 0.90)). Bivalirudin, followed by unfractionated heparin, LMWH plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor, unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor, and fondaparinux were the hierarchy for treatment safety. Results were similar in direct comparison meta-analyses: bivalirudin was associated with a 39%, 44%, and 65% higher risk of myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stent thrombosis respectively when compared with unfractionated heparin with or without GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor. However, bivalirudin was associated with a 48% lower risk of major bleeding compared with unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor and 32% lower compared with unfractionated heparin alone.In patients undergoing primary PCI, unfractionated heparin plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor and LMWH plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor were most efficacious, with the lowest rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, whereas bivalirudin was safest, with the lowest bleeding. These relationships should be considered in selecting anticoagulant therapies in patients undergoing primary PCI.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

DOI

EISSN

1756-1833

ISSN

0959-8138

Publication Date

November 2014

Volume

349

Start / End Page

g6419

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thrombosis
  • Stents
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Polysaccharides
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bangalore, S., Toklu, B., Kotwal, A., Volodarskiy, A., Sharma, S., Kirtane, A. J., & Feit, F. (2014). Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 349, g6419. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6419
Bangalore, Sripal, Bora Toklu, Anupam Kotwal, Alexander Volodarskiy, Sahil Sharma, Ajay J. Kirtane, and Frederick Feit. “Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors.BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 349 (November 2014): g6419. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6419.
Bangalore S, Toklu B, Kotwal A, Volodarskiy A, Sharma S, Kirtane AJ, et al. Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2014 Nov;349:g6419.
Bangalore S, Toklu B, Kotwal A, Volodarskiy A, Sharma S, Kirtane AJ, Feit F. Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2014 Nov;349:g6419.

Published In

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

DOI

EISSN

1756-1833

ISSN

0959-8138

Publication Date

November 2014

Volume

349

Start / End Page

g6419

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thrombosis
  • Stents
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Polysaccharides
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Myocardial Infarction