Skip to main content

A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cogan, GB; Poeppel, D
Published in: J Neurophysiol
August 2011

Recent work has implicated low-frequency (<20 Hz) neuronal phase information as important for both auditory (<10 Hz) and speech [theta (∼4-8 Hz)] perception. Activity on the timescale of theta corresponds linguistically to the average length of a syllable, suggesting that information within this range has consequences for segmentation of meaningful units of speech. Longer timescales that correspond to lower frequencies [delta (1-3 Hz)] also reflect important linguistic features-prosodic/suprasegmental-but it is unknown whether the patterns of activity in this range are similar to theta. We investigate low-frequency activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and mutual information (MI), an analysis that has not yet been applied to noninvasive electrophysiological recordings. We find that during speech perception each frequency subband examined [delta (1-3 Hz), theta(low) (3-5 Hz), theta(high) (5-7 Hz)] processes independent information from the speech stream. This contrasts with hypotheses that either delta and theta reflect their corresponding linguistic levels of analysis or each band is part of a single holistic onset response that tracks global acoustic transitions in the speech stream. Single-trial template-based classifier results further validate this finding: information from each subband can be used to classify individual sentences, and classifier results that utilize the combination of frequency bands provide better results than single bands alone. Our results suggest that during speech perception low-frequency phase of the MEG signal corresponds to neither abstract linguistic units nor holistic evoked potentials but rather tracks different aspects of the input signal. This study also validates a new method of analysis for noninvasive electrophysiological recordings that can be used to formally characterize information content of neural responses and interactions between these responses. Furthermore, it bridges results from different levels of neurophysiological study: small-scale multiunit recordings and local field potentials and macroscopic magneto/electrophysiological noninvasive recordings.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Neurophysiol

DOI

EISSN

1522-1598

Publication Date

August 2011

Volume

106

Issue

2

Start / End Page

554 / 563

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Speech Perception
  • Speech
  • Neurons
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male
  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Auditory Pathways
  • Adult
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cogan, G. B., & Poeppel, D. (2011). A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information. J Neurophysiol, 106(2), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00075.2011
Cogan, Gregory B., and David Poeppel. “A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information.J Neurophysiol 106, no. 2 (August 2011): 554–63. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00075.2011.
Cogan, Gregory B., and David Poeppel. “A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information.J Neurophysiol, vol. 106, no. 2, Aug. 2011, pp. 554–63. Pubmed, doi:10.1152/jn.00075.2011.
Cogan GB, Poeppel D. A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;106(2):554–563.

Published In

J Neurophysiol

DOI

EISSN

1522-1598

Publication Date

August 2011

Volume

106

Issue

2

Start / End Page

554 / 563

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Speech Perception
  • Speech
  • Neurons
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male
  • Magnetoencephalography
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Auditory Pathways
  • Adult