Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Efimova, O; Berse, B; Denhalter, DW; DuVall, SL; Filipski, KK; Icardi, M; Kelley, MJ; Lynch, JA
Published in: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
May 30, 2017

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines recommend epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to predict the benefit of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib as first-line treatment. Proteomic (VeriStrat) testing is recommended for patients with EGFR negative or unknown status when erlotinib is being considered. Departure from this clinical algorithm can increase costs and may result in worse outcomes. We examined EGFR and proteomic testing among patients with NSCLC within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). We explored adherence to guidelines and the impact of test results on treatment decisions and cost of care. METHODS: Proteomic and EGFR test results from 2013 to 2015 were merged with VA electronic health records and pharmacy data. Chart reviews were conducted. Cases were categorized based on the appropriateness of testing and treatment. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients with NSCLC who underwent proteomic testing, 33 (48%) were EGFR-negative and 36 (52%) did not have documented EGFR status. We analyzed 138 clinical decisions surrounding EGFR/proteomic testing and erlotinib treatment. Most decisions (105, or 76%) were concordant with clinical practice guidelines. However, for 24 (17%) decisions documentation of testing or justification of treatment was inadequate, and 9 (7%) decisions represented clear departures from guidelines. CONCLUSION: EGFR testing, the least expensive clinical intervention analyzed in this study, was significantly underutilized or undocumented. The records of more than half of the patients lacked information on EGFR status. Our analysis illustrated several clinical scenarios where the timing of proteomic testing and erlotinib diverged from the recommended algorithm, resulting in excessive costs of care with no documented improvements in health outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

DOI

EISSN

1472-6947

Publication Date

May 30, 2017

Volume

17

Issue

1

Start / End Page

71

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proteomics
  • Polymorphism, Genetic
  • Middle Aged
  • Medical Informatics
  • Medical Audit
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Efimova, O., Berse, B., Denhalter, D. W., DuVall, S. L., Filipski, K. K., Icardi, M., … Lynch, J. A. (2017). Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 17(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0475-8
Efimova, Olga, Brygida Berse, Daniel W. Denhalter, Scott L. DuVall, Kelly K. Filipski, Michael Icardi, Michael J. Kelley, and Julie A. Lynch. “Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 17, no. 1 (May 30, 2017): 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0475-8.
Efimova O, Berse B, Denhalter DW, DuVall SL, Filipski KK, Icardi M, et al. Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 May 30;17(1):71.
Efimova, Olga, et al. “Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, vol. 17, no. 1, May 2017, p. 71. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0475-8.
Efimova O, Berse B, Denhalter DW, DuVall SL, Filipski KK, Icardi M, Kelley MJ, Lynch JA. Clinical decisions surrounding genomic and proteomic testing among United States veterans treated for lung cancer within the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 May 30;17(1):71.
Journal cover image

Published In

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

DOI

EISSN

1472-6947

Publication Date

May 30, 2017

Volume

17

Issue

1

Start / End Page

71

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Proteomics
  • Polymorphism, Genetic
  • Middle Aged
  • Medical Informatics
  • Medical Audit
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans