Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
PURPOSE: To investigate a measurement method for evaluating the resolution properties of CT imaging systems across reconstruction algorithms, dose, and contrast. METHODS: An algorithm was developed to extract the task-based modulation transfer function (MTF) from disk images generated from the rod inserts in the ACR phantom (model 464 Gammex, WI). These inserts are conventionally employed for HU accuracy assessment. The edge of the disk objects was analyzed to determine the edge-spread function, which was differentiated to yield the line-spread function and Fourier-transformed to generate the object-specific MTF for task-based assessment, denoted MTFTask . The proposed MTF measurement method was validated against the conventional wire technique and further applied to measure the MTF of CT images reconstructed with an adaptive statistical iterative algorithm (ASIR) and a model-based iterative (MBIR) algorithm. Results were further compared to the standard filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm. Measurements were performed and compared across different doses and contrast levels to ascertain the MTFTask dependencies on those factors. RESULTS: For the FBP reconstructed images, the MTFTask measured with the inserts were the same as the MTF measured from the wire-based method. For the ASIR and MBIR data, the MTFTask using the high contrast insert was similar to the wire-based MTF and equal or superior to that of FBP. However, results for the MTFTask measured using the low-contrast inserts, the MTFTask for ASIR and MBIR data was lower than for the FBP, which was constant throughout all measurements. Similarly, as a function of mA, the MTFTask for ASIR and MBIR varied as a function of noise--with MTFTask being proportional to mA. Overall greater variability of MTFTask across dose and contrast was observed for MBIR than for ASIR. CONCLUSIONS: This approach provides a method for assessing the task-based MTF of a CT system using conventional and iterative reconstructions. Results demonstrated that the object-specific MTF can vary as a function of dose and contrast. The analysis highlighted the paradigm shift for iterative reconstructions when compared to FBP, where iterative reconstructions generally offer superior noise performance but with varying resolution as a function of dose and contrast. The MTFTask generated by this method is expected to provide a more comprehensive assessment of image resolution across different reconstruction algorithms and imaging tasks.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Reproducibility of Results
- Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
- Radiographic Image Enhancement
- Phantoms, Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Humans
- Algorithms
- 5105 Medical and biological physics
Citation
Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Reproducibility of Results
- Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
- Radiographic Image Enhancement
- Phantoms, Imaging
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Humans
- Algorithms
- 5105 Medical and biological physics