Skip to main content

Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Shaver, EC; Silliman, BR
Published in: PeerJ
January 2017

Coral reefs are among the most biodiverse and productive ecosystems on Earth, and provide critical ecosystem services such as protein provisioning, coastal protection, and tourism revenue. Despite these benefits, coral reefs have been declining precipitously across the globe due to human impacts and climate change. Recent efforts to combat these declines are increasingly turning to restoration to help reseed corals and speed-up recovery processes. Coastal restoration theory and practice has historically favored transplanting designs that reduce potentially harmful negative species interactions, such as competition between transplants. However, recent research in salt marsh ecosystems has shown that shifting this theory to strategically incorporate positive interactions significantly enhances restoration yield with little additional cost or investment. Although some coral restoration efforts plant corals in protected areas in order to benefit from the facilitative effects of herbivores that reduce competitive macroalgae, little systematic effort has been made in coral restoration to identify the entire suite of positive interactions that could promote population enhancement efforts. Here, we highlight key positive species interactions that managers and restoration practitioners should utilize to facilitate the restoration of corals, including (i) trophic facilitation, (ii) mutualisms, (iii) long-distance facilitation, (iv) positive density-dependence, (v) positive legacy effects, and (vi) synergisms between biodiversity and ecosystem function. As live coral cover continues to decline and resources are limited to restore coral populations, innovative solutions that increase efficiency of restoration efforts will be critical to conserving and maintaining healthy coral reef ecosystems and the human communities that rely on them.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

PeerJ

DOI

EISSN

2167-8359

ISSN

2167-8359

Publication Date

January 2017

Volume

5

Start / End Page

e3499

Related Subject Headings

  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Shaver, E. C., & Silliman, B. R. (2017). Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration. PeerJ, 5, e3499. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3499
Shaver, Elizabeth C., and Brian R. Silliman. “Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration.PeerJ 5 (January 2017): e3499. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3499.
Shaver EC, Silliman BR. Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration. PeerJ. 2017 Jan;5:e3499.
Shaver, Elizabeth C., and Brian R. Silliman. “Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration.PeerJ, vol. 5, Jan. 2017, p. e3499. Epmc, doi:10.7717/peerj.3499.
Shaver EC, Silliman BR. Time to cash in on positive interactions for coral restoration. PeerJ. 2017 Jan;5:e3499.

Published In

PeerJ

DOI

EISSN

2167-8359

ISSN

2167-8359

Publication Date

January 2017

Volume

5

Start / End Page

e3499

Related Subject Headings

  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences