Skip to main content

SU‐DD‐A1‐02: Parameter Optimization in Head and Neck IMRT for Elekta Linacs

Publication ,  Conference
Worthy, D; Wu, Q
Published in: Medical Physics
January 1, 2008

Purpose: Planning and delivery in HN‐IMRT is challenging for Elekta linacs because of numerous constraints on beam delivery systems. The purpose of this study is to find a set of planning parameters that are applicable to most patients and optimal in terms of plan quality, delivery efficiency and dosimetric accuracy. Method and Materials: Four types of plans were created for each of 12 patients: ideal fluence optimization (FO), conventional two‐step optimization (TS) consisting of FO followed by MLC conversion, segment weight optimization (SW) and direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO). Maximum number of segments (NS) and minimum segment area (MSA) were varied in DMPO. Plan quality was evaluated based on score, dose distributions and dosimetric indices. Delivery efficiency was evaluated by irradiation time, and dosimetric accuracy by Mapcheck. Results: Plan quality deviates most from ideal FO for TS, with slight improvement for SW. DMPO is the closest to FO with the least variation among patients. NS of 80–160 in DMPO yield optimal plans. At larger NS (⩾80), plan quality decreases with MSA as expected, except for MSA <8cm2, which suggests presence of local minima in the DMPO algorithm. The irradiation time is strongly dependent on the plan segments (NSactual), weakly dependent on MUs, and independent of MSA. Typical plans with 79 segments and 8cm2 MSA have ∼747 MU and take ∼ 8 minutes to deliver; this increases to ∼13 minutes for 158 segments. Dosimetric accuracy is independent of DMPO parameters. Conclusion: The superior quality of DMPO plans makes it ideal for planning HN‐IMRT on Elekta linacs and its consistency allows development of class solutions. However, the vulnerability of local minima warrants such a study to systematically evaluate the effect of parameters in new planning techniques. The optimal set of parameters should be chosen to balance plan quality and delivery efficiency. © 2008, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Medical Physics

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

35

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2631

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Worthy, D., & Wu, Q. (2008). SU‐DD‐A1‐02: Parameter Optimization in Head and Neck IMRT for Elekta Linacs. In Medical Physics (Vol. 35, p. 2631). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2961351
Worthy, D., and Q. Wu. “SU‐DD‐A1‐02: Parameter Optimization in Head and Neck IMRT for Elekta Linacs.” In Medical Physics, 35:2631, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2961351.
Worthy, D., and Q. Wu. “SU‐DD‐A1‐02: Parameter Optimization in Head and Neck IMRT for Elekta Linacs.” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 6, 2008, p. 2631. Scopus, doi:10.1118/1.2961351.

Published In

Medical Physics

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

35

Issue

6

Start / End Page

2631

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences