Skip to main content

Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gatta, LA; Kuller, JA; Rhee, EHJ
Published in: Obstet Gynecol Surv
August 2017

BACKGROUND: Conservative excisional measures used to manage cervical dysplasia are often cited as risk factors for preterm labor in subsequent pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: We performed an evidence-based review of the obstetric complications following excisional procedures for cervical dysplasia in women of reproductive age. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Between 1993 and 2016, there were 7 published meta-analyses of cohort studies that consistently demonstrated an association between excisional cervical procedures and preterm labor. However, controversy remains as to whether the increased risk is due to the cervical amputation or to the risk factors that underlie the dysplasia. RESULTS: Although data suggest an association between excisional procedures and preterm labor, the choice of the control group may either overestimate or underestimate the relative risk. In addition, recent data suggest that depth of excision greater than 10 to 12 mm is associated with increases in risk of preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: Women with cervical dysplasia are at an increased baseline risk of preterm birth, and surgical excision confers additional risk. Pregnant patients with advanced cervical dysplasia or a history of surgical excision should be considered high-risk pregnancies.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Obstet Gynecol Surv

DOI

EISSN

1533-9866

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

72

Issue

8

Start / End Page

494 / 499

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
  • Risk Factors
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetric Labor, Premature
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Electrosurgery
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gatta, L. A., Kuller, J. A., & Rhee, E. H. J. (2017). Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 72(8), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000468
Gatta, Luke A., Jeffrey A. Kuller, and Eleanor H. J. Rhee. “Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures.Obstet Gynecol Surv 72, no. 8 (August 2017): 494–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000468.
Gatta LA, Kuller JA, Rhee EHJ. Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Aug;72(8):494–9.
Gatta, Luke A., et al. “Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures.Obstet Gynecol Surv, vol. 72, no. 8, Aug. 2017, pp. 494–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000468.
Gatta LA, Kuller JA, Rhee EHJ. Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Aug;72(8):494–499.

Published In

Obstet Gynecol Surv

DOI

EISSN

1533-9866

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

72

Issue

8

Start / End Page

494 / 499

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
  • Risk Factors
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetric Labor, Premature
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Electrosurgery