Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sharon, JD; Northcutt, BG; Aygun, N; Francis, HW
Published in: Otol Neurotol
October 2016

OBJECTIVE: To study the quality and usability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained with a cochlear implant magnet in situ. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent brain MRI with a cochlear implant magnet in situ from 2007 to 2016. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Grade of view of the ipsilateral internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 765 image sequences in 57 MRI brain scans. For the ipsilateral IAC, significant predictors of a grade 1 (normal) view included: absence of fat saturation algorithm (p = 0.001), nonaxial plane of imaging (p = 0.01), and contrast administration (p = 0.001). For the ipsilateral CPA, significant predictors of a grade 1 view included: absence of fat saturation algorithm (p = 0.001), high-resolution images (p = 0.001), and nonaxial plane of imaging (p = 0.001). Overall, coronal T1 high-resolution images produced the highest percentage of grade 1 views (89%). Fat saturation also caused a secondary ring-shaped distortion artifact, which impaired the view of the contralateral CPA 52.7% of the time, and the contralateral IAC 42.8% of the time. MRI scans without any usable (grade 1) sequences had fewer overall sequences (N = 4.3) than scans with at least one usable sequence (N = 7.1, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: MRI image quality with a cochlear implant magnet in situ depends on several factors, which can be modified to maximize image quality in this unique patient population.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Otol Neurotol

DOI

EISSN

1537-4505

Publication Date

October 2016

Volume

37

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1284 / 1290

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Magnets
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cochlear Implants
  • Brain
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sharon, J. D., Northcutt, B. G., Aygun, N., & Francis, H. W. (2016). Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability. Otol Neurotol, 37(9), 1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001176
Sharon, Jeffrey D., Benjamin G. Northcutt, Nafi Aygun, and Howard W. Francis. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability.Otol Neurotol 37, no. 9 (October 2016): 1284–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001176.
Sharon JD, Northcutt BG, Aygun N, Francis HW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1284–90.
Sharon, Jeffrey D., et al. “Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability.Otol Neurotol, vol. 37, no. 9, Oct. 2016, pp. 1284–90. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001176.
Sharon JD, Northcutt BG, Aygun N, Francis HW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla With a Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Image Quality and Usability. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1284–1290.

Published In

Otol Neurotol

DOI

EISSN

1537-4505

Publication Date

October 2016

Volume

37

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1284 / 1290

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Magnets
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cochlear Implants
  • Brain