Skip to main content

Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Grewal, DS; Sehi, M; Greenfield, DS; Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group,
Published in: Br J Ophthalmol
August 2011

BACKGROUND: This prospective analysis was designed to examine the rate of RNFL loss using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx enhanced corneal compensation (GDxECC)) in progressing versus non-progressing eyes using various methods to define functional progression. METHODS: Glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes with ≥3 years of follow-up participating in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study were enrolled. All eyes underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and GDxECC imaging every 6 months. The annual rate of RNFL loss with GDxECC was calculated using linear regression analysis. Functional progression was determined using the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) criterion, SAP Visual Field Index (VFI) and Progressor software. RESULTS: Fifty-three eyes (30 glaucoma suspect, 23 glaucoma) of 53 patients (mean age 64.5±10.7 years, range 42-79) were enrolled. Eighteen eyes (40%) demonstrated SAP progression during the follow-up period using the Progressor criterion, 10 eyes (18.9%) using the VFI criterion, and 3 eyes (5.7%) using the EMGT criterion. The annual rate (μm/year) of mean RNFL loss was significantly greater (p<0.05) in progressing versus non-progressing eyes using Progressor (-1.24±0.99 vs -0.18±0.49), EMGT (-1.95±0.99 vs -0.46±0.78) and VFI (-1.11±0.64 vs -0.41±0.85) criteria. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in the criteria used to judge functional progression, progressing eyes have a significantly greater rate of RNFL loss measured using GDxECC as compared with non-progressing eyes.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Br J Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1468-2079

Publication Date

August 2011

Volume

95

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1122 / 1127

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Fields
  • Visual Field Tests
  • Scanning Laser Polarimetry
  • Retina
  • Prospective Studies
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Nerve Fibers
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Grewal, D. S., Sehi, M., Greenfield, D. S., & Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group, . (2011). Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression. Br J Ophthalmol, 95(8), 1122–1127. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.183483
Grewal, Dilraj S., Mitra Sehi, David S. Greenfield, and David S. Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group. “Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression.Br J Ophthalmol 95, no. 8 (August 2011): 1122–27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.183483.
Grewal DS, Sehi M, Greenfield DS, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group. Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;95(8):1122–7.
Grewal, Dilraj S., et al. “Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression.Br J Ophthalmol, vol. 95, no. 8, Aug. 2011, pp. 1122–27. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.183483.
Grewal DS, Sehi M, Greenfield DS, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group. Comparing rates of retinal nerve fibre layer loss with GDxECC using different methods of visual-field progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;95(8):1122–1127.

Published In

Br J Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1468-2079

Publication Date

August 2011

Volume

95

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1122 / 1127

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Fields
  • Visual Field Tests
  • Scanning Laser Polarimetry
  • Retina
  • Prospective Studies
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Nerve Fibers
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans