Skip to main content
Journal cover image

International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kyte, D; Reeve, BB; Efficace, F; Haywood, K; Mercieca-Bebber, R; King, MT; Norquist, JM; Lenderking, WR; Snyder, C; Ring, L; Velikova, G; Calvert, M
Published in: Qual Life Res
February 2016

In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released for comment a draft reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. A twelve-member International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) taskforce was convened to coordinate the ISOQOL response. Twenty-one ISOQOL members provided detailed comments and suggestions on the paper: 81 % from academia and 19 % from industry. Taskforce members consolidated and further refined these comments and shared the recommendations with the wider ISOQOL membership. A final response was submitted to the EMA in November 2014. The impending publication of the EMA reflection paper presents a valuable opportunity for ISOQOL to comment on the current direction of EMA PRO guidance and strategy. The EMA paper, although focused on cancer, could serve as a model for using PROs in other conditions, as it provides a useful update surrounding some of the design issues common to all trial research including PRO endpoints. However, we believe there are a number of additional areas in need of greater consideration. The purpose of this commentary is therefore to highlight the strengths of this timely and potentially useful document, but also to outline areas that may warrant further discussion.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Qual Life Res

DOI

EISSN

1573-2649

Publication Date

February 2016

Volume

25

Issue

2

Start / End Page

359 / 362

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Self Report
  • Research
  • Quality of Life
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Neoplasms
  • Medical Oncology
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Europe
  • 44 Human society
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kyte, D., Reeve, B. B., Efficace, F., Haywood, K., Mercieca-Bebber, R., King, M. T., … Calvert, M. (2016). International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. Qual Life Res, 25(2), 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1099-z
Kyte, Derek, Bryce B. Reeve, Fabio Efficace, Kirstie Haywood, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Madeleine T. King, Josephine M. Norquist, et al. “International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.Qual Life Res 25, no. 2 (February 2016): 359–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1099-z.
Kyte D, Reeve BB, Efficace F, Haywood K, Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Snyder C, Ring L, Velikova G, Calvert M. International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):359–362.
Journal cover image

Published In

Qual Life Res

DOI

EISSN

1573-2649

Publication Date

February 2016

Volume

25

Issue

2

Start / End Page

359 / 362

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Self Report
  • Research
  • Quality of Life
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Neoplasms
  • Medical Oncology
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Europe
  • 44 Human society