Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success

Publication ,  Journal Article
Johnson, DE; Barrio Froján, C; Turner, PJ; Weaver, P; Gunn, V; Dunn, DC; Halpin, P; Bax, NJ; Dunstan, PK
Published in: Marine Policy
February 1, 2018

This paper reviews key aspects of the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity's Ecologically or Biologically Significant Area (EBSA) process to date, anticipating global marine coverage of that process in so far as is possible by the end of 2018. EBSAs merge marine and coastal physical, biological and biogeographical information held by States, diverse scientific institutions and individual experts to identify inherent value of marine biodiversity, as well as providing a focus for either States or international organisations with sectoral competences to apply potential management measures to protect and sustainably manage biodiversity. In assessing information made available at dedicated EBSA Regional Workshops, several common patterns emerged, both in the data made available and in the gaps in information. The latter include missing information, representation of taxa and features of interest, and specialist expertise. The review exercise detailed here has highlighted the value and efficacy of the EBSA process and the information it has generated, despite some recognised shortcomings. It further suggests that there is potential to strengthen the EBSA portfolio by (i) adding some selected new areas yet to be described, (ii) revisiting existing EBSAs to add both new and existing information, and (iii) reconsidering some areas previously deemed to not meet the EBSA criteria by incorporating both new and existing information. Improving the systematic assessment of areas against the EBSA criteria could be achieved using a combination of (i) spatially precise systematic conservation approaches, supported by (ii) predictive modelling and biogeographic multi-criteria approaches based on expert judgement.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Marine Policy

DOI

ISSN

0308-597X

Publication Date

February 1, 2018

Volume

88

Start / End Page

75 / 85

Related Subject Headings

  • Fisheries
  • 4408 Political science
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 1801 Law
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Johnson, D. E., Barrio Froján, C., Turner, P. J., Weaver, P., Gunn, V., Dunn, D. C., … Dunstan, P. K. (2018). Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success. Marine Policy, 88, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.014
Johnson, D. E., C. Barrio Froján, P. J. Turner, P. Weaver, V. Gunn, D. C. Dunn, P. Halpin, N. J. Bax, and P. K. Dunstan. “Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success.” Marine Policy 88 (February 1, 2018): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.014.
Johnson DE, Barrio Froján C, Turner PJ, Weaver P, Gunn V, Dunn DC, et al. Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success. Marine Policy. 2018 Feb 1;88:75–85.
Johnson, D. E., et al. “Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success.” Marine Policy, vol. 88, Feb. 2018, pp. 75–85. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.014.
Johnson DE, Barrio Froján C, Turner PJ, Weaver P, Gunn V, Dunn DC, Halpin P, Bax NJ, Dunstan PK. Reviewing the EBSA process: Improving on success. Marine Policy. 2018 Feb 1;88:75–85.
Journal cover image

Published In

Marine Policy

DOI

ISSN

0308-597X

Publication Date

February 1, 2018

Volume

88

Start / End Page

75 / 85

Related Subject Headings

  • Fisheries
  • 4408 Political science
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 1801 Law
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management