Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Unger, CA; Barber, MD
Published in: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
2015

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to measure the efficacy of an intervention and is considered to be the most rigorous form of research, allowing for causal inferences to be made between treatments and outcomes. When designing an RCT, one must consider its essential methodological components including randomization, allocation, blinding, choice of outcome measures, sample size, loss to follow-up, and crossover. In contrast to RCTs of medical therapy, surgical trials face unique challenges that can affect study design, implementation, and interpretation of results. However, there are strategies that researchers can use to try to mitigate many of these challenges to improve the validity of the study. In addition, there are unique ethical considerations that must be examined when designing surgical trials, and steps must be taken to acknowledge them while maintaining the integrity of the study design. RCTs remain the best design to evaluate the efficacy of novel surgical treatments; however, researchers should be aware of and address the unique challenges inherent to surgical trials.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1553-4669

Publication Date

2015

Volume

22

Issue

4

Start / End Page

573 / 582

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Research Design
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Unger, C. A., & Barber, M. D. (2015). Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22(4), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.012
Unger, Cecile A., and Matthew D. Barber. “Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial.J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22, no. 4 (2015): 573–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.012.
Unger CA, Barber MD. Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(4):573–82.
Unger, Cecile A., and Matthew D. Barber. “Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial.J Minim Invasive Gynecol, vol. 22, no. 4, 2015, pp. 573–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.012.
Unger CA, Barber MD. Studying surgical innovations: challenges of the randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(4):573–582.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1553-4669

Publication Date

2015

Volume

22

Issue

4

Start / End Page

573 / 582

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Research Design
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine