Skip to main content

Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Muffly, TM; Weterings, R; Barber, MD; Steinberg, AC
Published in: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg
2015

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether the current distribution of surgeons practicing female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery in the United States is adequate to meet the needs of a growing and aging population. We assessed the geographic distribution of female pelvic surgeons as represented by members of the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) throughout the United States at the county, state, and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists district levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: County-level data from the AUGS, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the United States Census were analyzed in this observational study. State and national patterns of female pelvic surgeon density were mapped graphically using ArcGIS software and 2010 US Census demographic data. RESULTS: In 2013, the 1058 AUGS practicing physicians represented 0.13% of the total physician workforce. There were 6.7 AUGS members available for every 1 million women and 20 AUGS members for every 1 million postreproductive-aged women in the United States. The density of female pelvic surgeons was highest in metropolitan areas. Overall, 88% of the counties in the United States lacked female pelvic surgeons. Nationwide, there was a mean of 1 AUGS member for every 31 practicing general obstetrician-gynecologists. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications for training, recruiting, and retaining female pelvic surgeons. The uneven distribution of female pelvic surgeons throughout the United States is likely to worsen as graduating female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows continue to cluster in urban areas.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg

DOI

EISSN

2154-4212

Publication Date

2015

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

99 / 105

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Workforce
  • Urology
  • Urban Health Services
  • United States
  • Statistical Distributions
  • Societies
  • Rural Health Services
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Physicians
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Muffly, T. M., Weterings, R., Barber, M. D., & Steinberg, A. C. (2015). Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 21(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000143
Muffly, Tyler M., Robbie Weterings, Mathew D. Barber, and Adam C. Steinberg. “Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 21, no. 2 (2015): 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000143.
Muffly TM, Weterings R, Barber MD, Steinberg AC. Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(2):99–105.
Muffly, Tyler M., et al. “Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, vol. 21, no. 2, 2015, pp. 99–105. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000143.
Muffly TM, Weterings R, Barber MD, Steinberg AC. Discrepancies in the female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeon workforce. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(2):99–105.

Published In

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg

DOI

EISSN

2154-4212

Publication Date

2015

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

99 / 105

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Workforce
  • Urology
  • Urban Health Services
  • United States
  • Statistical Distributions
  • Societies
  • Rural Health Services
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Physicians
  • Humans