Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Whiteside, JL; Barber, MD; Paraiso, MF; Hugney, CM; Walters, MD
Published in: Am J Obstet Gynecol
July 2004

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the clinical examination of anterior vaginal wall support defects. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-three patients with at least stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse were prospectively evaluated with a standardized examination to detect anterior vaginal wall support defects. Interobserver reliability was assessed with a duplicate examination performed by a blinded second examiner. Intraobserver reliability was assessed with a second examination performed at least 3 weeks later by 1 of the original 2 examiners. Examination reliability for the 4 types of defects (central, right lateral, left lateral, and superior) was evaluated with the kappa statistic. RESULTS: The inter- and intraexaminer reliability of the clinical examination for central, superior, and right and left paravaginal defects was poor; all kappas were less than 0.50. Overall interexaminer agreement was 42% with a kappa of 0.16 (95% CI, 0-0.32). Overall intraexaminer agreement was 46% with a kappa of 0.16 (95% CI, 0-0.45). Reliability was noted to improve with increasing stage of prolapse. CONCLUSION: The clinical examination of anterior vaginal wall support defects displays poor interexaminer and intraexaminer agreement.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

ISSN

0002-9378

Publication Date

July 2004

Volume

191

Issue

1

Start / End Page

100 / 104

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prospective Studies
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Observer Variation
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Aged
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Whiteside, J. L., Barber, M. D., Paraiso, M. F., Hugney, C. M., & Walters, M. D. (2004). Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 191(1), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.053
Whiteside, James L., Matthew D. Barber, Marie F. Paraiso, Cathy M. Hugney, and Mark D. Walters. “Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability.Am J Obstet Gynecol 191, no. 1 (July 2004): 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.053.
Whiteside JL, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Hugney CM, Walters MD. Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):100–4.
Whiteside, James L., et al. “Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability.Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 191, no. 1, July 2004, pp. 100–04. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.053.
Whiteside JL, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Hugney CM, Walters MD. Clinical evaluation of anterior vaginal wall support defects: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):100–104.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

ISSN

0002-9378

Publication Date

July 2004

Volume

191

Issue

1

Start / End Page

100 / 104

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prospective Studies
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Observer Variation
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Aged
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine