Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Barber, MD; Spino, C; Janz, NK; Brubaker, L; Nygaard, I; Nager, CW; Wheeler, TL; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network,
Published in: Am J Obstet Gynecol
May 2009

OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the minimum important difference (MID) for the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI), UDI-stress subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ) of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: We calculated MID using anchor- and distribution-based approaches from a randomized trial for nonsurgical stress incontinence treatment. Anchors included a global impression of change, incontinence episodes from a urinary diary, and the Incontinence Severity Index. Effect size and standard error of measurement were the distribution methods used. RESULTS: Anchor-based MIDs ranged from -22.4 to -6.4 points for the UDI, -16.5 to -4.6 points for the UDI-stress, and -17.0 to -6.5 points for the UIQ. These data were supported by 2 distribution-based estimates. CONCLUSION: Reasonable estimates of MID are 11, 8, and 16 points for the UDI, UDI-stress subscale, and UIQ, respectively. Statistically significant improvements that meet these thresholds should be considered clinically important.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

200

Issue

5

Start / End Page

580.e1 / 580.e7

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Pelvic Floor
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Barber, M. D., Spino, C., Janz, N. K., Brubaker, L., Nygaard, I., Nager, C. W., … Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, . (2009). The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 200(5), 580.e1-580.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.007
Barber, Matthew D., Cathie Spino, Nancy K. Janz, Linda Brubaker, Ingrid Nygaard, Charles W. Nager, Thomas L. Wheeler, and Thomas L. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. “The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire.Am J Obstet Gynecol 200, no. 5 (May 2009): 580.e1-580.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.007.
Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Nager CW, et al. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):580.e1-580.e7.
Barber, Matthew D., et al. “The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire.Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 200, no. 5, May 2009, pp. 580.e1-580.e7. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.007.
Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Nager CW, Wheeler TL, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):580.e1-580.e7.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

200

Issue

5

Start / End Page

580.e1 / 580.e7

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Pelvic Floor
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female