Skip to main content

Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Economopoulos, KP; Choussein, S; Sergentanis, TN
Published in: The New England journal of medicine
May 2010

Duke Scholars

Published In

The New England journal of medicine

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

ISSN

0028-4793

Publication Date

May 2010

Volume

362

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1842

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Monitoring
  • Research Design
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female
  • Cesarean Section
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Economopoulos, K. P., Choussein, S., & Sergentanis, T. N. (2010). Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(19), 1842. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc1002224
Economopoulos, Konstantinos P., Souzana Choussein, and Theodoros N. Sergentanis. “Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor.The New England Journal of Medicine 362, no. 19 (May 2010): 1842. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc1002224.
Economopoulos KP, Choussein S, Sergentanis TN. Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor. The New England journal of medicine. 2010 May;362(19):1842.
Economopoulos, Konstantinos P., et al. “Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor.The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 19, May 2010, p. 1842. Epmc, doi:10.1056/nejmc1002224.
Economopoulos KP, Choussein S, Sergentanis TN. Internal versus external tocodynamometry in labor. The New England journal of medicine. 2010 May;362(19):1842.

Published In

The New England journal of medicine

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

ISSN

0028-4793

Publication Date

May 2010

Volume

362

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1842

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Monitoring
  • Research Design
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Pregnancy
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female
  • Cesarean Section