Skip to main content

Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Katz, JN; Wright, J; Spindler, KP; Mandl, LA; Safran-Norton, CE; Reinke, EK; Levy, BA; Wright, RW; Jones, MH; Martin, SD; Marx, RG; Losina, E
Published in: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
November 2016

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) combined with physical therapy (PT) have yielded pain relief similar to that provided by PT alone in randomized trials of subjects with a degenerative meniscal tear. However, many patients randomized to PT received APM before assessment of the primary outcome. We sought to identify factors associated with crossing over to APM and to compare pain relief between patients who had crossed over to APM and those who had been randomized to APM.We used data from the MeTeOR (Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research) Trial of APM with PT versus PT alone in subjects ≥45 years old who had mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis and a degenerative meniscal tear. We assessed independent predictors of crossover to APM among those randomized to PT. We also compared pain relief at 6 months among those randomized to PT who crossed over to APM, those who did not cross over, and those originally randomized to APM.One hundred and sixty-four subjects were randomized to and received APM and 177 were randomized to PT, of whom 48 (27%) crossed over to receive APM in the first 140 days after randomization. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a higher likelihood of crossing over to APM among those who had originally been randomized to PT included a baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score of ≥40 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00, 3.93) and symptom duration of <1 year (RR = 1.74; 95% CI = 0.98, 3.08). Eighty-one percent of subjects who crossed over to APM and 82% of those randomized to APM had an improvement of ≥10 points in their pain score at 6 months, as did 73% of those who were randomized to and received only PT.Subjects who crossed over to APM had presented with a shorter symptom duration and greater baseline pain than those who did not cross over from PT. Subjects who crossed over had rates of surgical success similar to those of the patients who had been randomized to surgery. Our findings also suggest that an initial course of rigorous PT prior to APM may not compromise surgical outcome.Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

DOI

EISSN

1535-1386

ISSN

0021-9355

Publication Date

November 2016

Volume

98

Issue

22

Start / End Page

1890 / 1896

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries
  • Recovery of Function
  • Prognosis
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Pain Measurement
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Orthopedics
  • Orthopedic Procedures
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Katz, J. N., Wright, J., Spindler, K. P., Mandl, L. A., Safran-Norton, C. E., Reinke, E. K., … Losina, E. (2016). Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 98(22), 1890–1896. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01466
Katz, Jeffrey N., John Wright, Kurt P. Spindler, Lisa A. Mandl, Clare E. Safran-Norton, Emily K. Reinke, Bruce A. Levy, et al. “Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery.The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 98, no. 22 (November 2016): 1890–96. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01466.
Katz JN, Wright J, Spindler KP, Mandl LA, Safran-Norton CE, Reinke EK, et al. Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2016 Nov;98(22):1890–6.
Katz, Jeffrey N., et al. “Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery.The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, vol. 98, no. 22, Nov. 2016, pp. 1890–96. Epmc, doi:10.2106/jbjs.15.01466.
Katz JN, Wright J, Spindler KP, Mandl LA, Safran-Norton CE, Reinke EK, Levy BA, Wright RW, Jones MH, Martin SD, Marx RG, Losina E. Predictors and Outcomes of Crossover to Surgery from Physical Therapy for Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial Comparing Physical Therapy and Surgery. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2016 Nov;98(22):1890–1896.

Published In

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

DOI

EISSN

1535-1386

ISSN

0021-9355

Publication Date

November 2016

Volume

98

Issue

22

Start / End Page

1890 / 1896

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries
  • Recovery of Function
  • Prognosis
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Pain Measurement
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Orthopedics
  • Orthopedic Procedures
  • Middle Aged