Skip to main content

Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Man, S; Zhao, X; Uchino, K; Hussain, MS; Smith, EE; Bhatt, DL; Xian, Y; Schwamm, LH; Shah, S; Khan, Y; Fonarow, GC
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
June 2018

BACKGROUND: To improve stroke care, the Brain Attack Coalition recommended establishing primary stroke center (PSC) and comprehensive stroke center (CSC) certification. This study aimed to compare ischemic stroke care and in-hospital outcomes between CSCs and PSCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke who were hospitalized at stroke centers participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke from 2013 to 2015. Multivariable logistic regression models were generated to examine the association between stroke center certification (CSC versus PSC) and performances and outcomes. This study included 722 941 patients who were admitted to 134 CSCs and 1047 PSCs. Both CSCs and PSCs had good conformity to 7 performance measures and the summary defect-free care measure. Among emergency department admissions, CSCs had higher intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) and endovascular thrombectomy rates than PSCs (14.3% versus 10.3%, 4.1% versus 1.0%, respectively). Door to intravenous tPA time was shorter at CSCs (median, 52 versus 61 minutes; adjusted risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.95). More patients at CSCs had door to intravenous tPA time ≤60 minutes (79.7% versus 65.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.75). For transferred patients, CSCs and PSCs had comparable overall performance in defect-free care, except higher endovascular thrombectomy therapy rates. The overall in-hospital mortality was higher at CSCs in both emergency department admissions (4.6% versus 3.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.29) and transferred patients (7.7% versus 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.32). In-hospital outcomes were comparable between CSCs and PSCs in patients who received intravenous tPA or endovascular thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: CSCs and PSCs achieved similar overall care quality for patients with acute ischemic stroke. CSCs exceeded PSCs in timely acute reperfusion therapy for emergency department admissions, whereas PSCs had lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. This information may be important for acute stroke triage and targeted quality improvement.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

June 2018

Volume

11

Issue

6

Start / End Page

e004512

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time-to-Treatment
  • Time Factors
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Recovery of Function
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Man, S., Zhao, X., Uchino, K., Hussain, M. S., Smith, E. E., Bhatt, D. L., … Fonarow, G. C. (2018). Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 11(6), e004512. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004512
Man, Shumei, Xin Zhao, Ken Uchino, M Shazam Hussain, Eric E. Smith, Deepak L. Bhatt, Ying Xian, et al. “Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 11, no. 6 (June 2018): e004512. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004512.
Man S, Zhao X, Uchino K, Hussain MS, Smith EE, Bhatt DL, et al. Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004512.
Man, Shumei, et al. “Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, vol. 11, no. 6, June 2018, p. e004512. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004512.
Man S, Zhao X, Uchino K, Hussain MS, Smith EE, Bhatt DL, Xian Y, Schwamm LH, Shah S, Khan Y, Fonarow GC. Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004512.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

June 2018

Volume

11

Issue

6

Start / End Page

e004512

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time-to-Treatment
  • Time Factors
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Recovery of Function