Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gomez, LJ; Goetz, SM; Peterchev, AV
Published in: J Neural Eng
August 2018

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique used for research and clinical applications. Existent TMS coils are limited in their precision of spatial targeting (focality), especially for deeper targets. This paper presents a methodology for designing TMS coils to achieve optimal trade-off between the depth and focality of the induced electric field (E-field), as well as the energy required by the coil. APPROACH: A multi-objective optimization technique is used for computationally designing TMS coils that achieve optimal trade-offs between E-field focality, depth, and energy (fdTMS coils). The fdTMS coil winding(s) maximize focality (minimize the volume of the brain region with E-field above a given threshold) while reaching a target at a specified depth and not exceeding predefined peak E-field strength and required coil energy. Spherical and MRI-derived head models are used to compute the fundamental depth-focality trade-off as well as focality-energy trade-offs for specific target depths. MAIN RESULTS: Across stimulation target depths of 1.0-3.4 cm from the brain surface, the suprathreshold volume can be theoretically decreased by 42%-55% compared to existing TMS coil designs. The suprathreshold volume of a figure-8 coil can be decreased by 36%, 44%, or 46%, for matched, doubled, or quadrupled energy. For matched focality and energy, the depth of a figure-8 coil can be increased by 22%. SIGNIFICANCE: Computational design of TMS coils could enable more selective targeting of the induced E-field. The presented results appear to be the first significant advancement in the depth-focality trade-off of TMS coils since the introduction of the figure-8 coil three decades ago, and likely represent the fundamental physical limit.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Neural Eng

DOI

EISSN

1741-2552

Publication Date

August 2018

Volume

15

Issue

4

Start / End Page

046033

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Humans
  • Equipment Design
  • Electromagnetic Fields
  • Brain
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gomez, L. J., Goetz, S. M., & Peterchev, A. V. (2018). Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy. J Neural Eng, 15(4), 046033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aac967
Gomez, Luis J., Stefan M. Goetz, and Angel V. Peterchev. “Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.J Neural Eng 15, no. 4 (August 2018): 046033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aac967.
Gomez, Luis J., et al. “Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.J Neural Eng, vol. 15, no. 4, Aug. 2018, p. 046033. Pubmed, doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aac967.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Neural Eng

DOI

EISSN

1741-2552

Publication Date

August 2018

Volume

15

Issue

4

Start / End Page

046033

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Humans
  • Equipment Design
  • Electromagnetic Fields
  • Brain
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences