Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion

Publication ,  Journal Article
White, KK; Reiter, JP; Petrin, A
Published in: Review of Economics and Statistics
July 1, 2018

In the U.S. Census Bureau's 2002 and 2007 Censuses of Manufactures, 79% and 73% of observations, respectively, have imputed data for at least one variable used to compute total factor productivity (TFP). The bureau primarily imputes for missing values using mean-imputation methods, which can reduce the underlying variance of the imputed variables. For five variables entering TFP, we show that dispersion is significantly smaller in the Census mean-imputed versus the nonimputed data. We use classification and regression trees (CART) to produce multiple imputations with observed data for similar plants. For 90% of the 473 industries in 2002 and 84% of the 471 industries in 2007, we find that TFP dispersion increases as we move from Census mean-imputed data to nonimputed data to the CART-imputed data.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Review of Economics and Statistics

DOI

EISSN

1530-9142

ISSN

0034-6535

Publication Date

July 1, 2018

Volume

100

Issue

3

Start / End Page

502 / 509

Related Subject Headings

  • Economics
  • 3802 Econometrics
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 3502 Banking, finance and investment
  • 1403 Econometrics
  • 1402 Applied Economics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
White, K. K., Reiter, J. P., & Petrin, A. (2018). Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(3), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00678
White, K. K., J. P. Reiter, and A. Petrin. “Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion.” Review of Economics and Statistics 100, no. 3 (July 1, 2018): 502–9. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00678.
White KK, Reiter JP, Petrin A. Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2018 Jul 1;100(3):502–9.
White, K. K., et al. “Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion.” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 100, no. 3, July 2018, pp. 502–09. Scopus, doi:10.1162/rest_a_00678.
White KK, Reiter JP, Petrin A. Imputation in U.S. manufacturing data and its implications for productivity dispersion. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2018 Jul 1;100(3):502–509.
Journal cover image

Published In

Review of Economics and Statistics

DOI

EISSN

1530-9142

ISSN

0034-6535

Publication Date

July 1, 2018

Volume

100

Issue

3

Start / End Page

502 / 509

Related Subject Headings

  • Economics
  • 3802 Econometrics
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 3502 Banking, finance and investment
  • 1403 Econometrics
  • 1402 Applied Economics