How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment
Publication
, Journal Article
Garrett, B; Mitchell, G
Published in: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
2013
Duke Scholars
Published In
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Publication Date
2013
Volume
10
Issue
3
Start / End Page
484 / 511
Related Subject Headings
- 1801 Law
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Garrett, B., & Mitchell, G. (2013). How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(3), 484–511.
Garrett, B., and G. Mitchell. “How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10, no. 3 (2013): 484–511.
Garrett B, Mitchell G. How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2013;10(3):484–511.
Garrett, B., and G. Mitchell. “How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, 2013, pp. 484–511.
Garrett B, Mitchell G. How Jurors Evaluate Fingerprint Evidence: The Relative Importance of Match Language, Method Information, and Error Acknowledgment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2013;10(3):484–511.
Published In
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Publication Date
2013
Volume
10
Issue
3
Start / End Page
484 / 511
Related Subject Headings
- 1801 Law