Skip to main content

Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brown, KT; Do, RK; Gonen, M; Covey, AM; Getrajdman, GI; Sofocleous, CT; Jarnagin, WR; D'Angelica, MI; Allen, PJ; Erinjeri, JP; Brody, LA ...
Published in: J Clin Oncol
June 10, 2016

PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization is accepted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No randomized trial has demonstrated superiority of chemoembolization compared with embolization, and the role of chemotherapy remains unclear. This randomized trial compares the outcome of embolization using microspheres alone with chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a single tertiary referral center, patients with HCC were randomly assigned to embolization with microspheres alone (Bead Block [BB]) or loaded with doxorubicin 150 mg (LC Bead [LCB]). Random assignment was stratified by number of embolizations to complete treatment, and assignments were generated by permuted blocks in the institutional database. The primary end point was response according to RECIST 1.0 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) using multiphase computed tomography 2 to 3 weeks post-treatment and then at quarterly intervals, with the reviewer blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This trial is currently closed to accrual. RESULTS: Between December 2007 and April 2012, 101 patients were randomly assigned: 51 to BB and 50 to LCB. Demographics were comparable: median age, 67 years; 77% male; and 22% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A and 78% stage B or C. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups: BB, 19 of 51 patients (38%); LCB, 20 of 50 patients (40%; P = .48), with no difference in RECIST response: BB, 5.9% versus LCB, 6.0% (difference, -0.1%; 95% CI, -9% to 9%). Median PFS was 6.2 versus 2.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.05; P = .11), and overall survival, 19.6 versus 20.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.76; P = .64) for BB and LCB, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent difference between the treatment arms. These results challenge the use of doxorubicin-eluting beads for chemoembolization of HCC.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

June 10, 2016

Volume

34

Issue

17

Start / End Page

2046 / 2053

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Single-Blind Method
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Microspheres
  • Male
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Doxorubicin
  • Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brown, K. T., Do, R. K., Gonen, M., Covey, A. M., Getrajdman, G. I., Sofocleous, C. T., … Abou-Alfa, G. K. (2016). Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone. J Clin Oncol, 34(17), 2046–2053. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0821
Brown, Karen T., Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, et al. “Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone.J Clin Oncol 34, no. 17 (June 10, 2016): 2046–53. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0821.
Brown KT, Do RK, Gonen M, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, et al. Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;34(17):2046–53.
Brown, Karen T., et al. “Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone.J Clin Oncol, vol. 34, no. 17, June 2016, pp. 2046–53. Pubmed, doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0821.
Brown KT, Do RK, Gonen M, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, Sofocleous CT, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ, Erinjeri JP, Brody LA, O’Neill GP, Johnson KN, Garcia AR, Beattie C, Zhao B, Solomon SB, Schwartz LH, DeMatteo R, Abou-Alfa GK. Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;34(17):2046–2053.

Published In

J Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

June 10, 2016

Volume

34

Issue

17

Start / End Page

2046 / 2053

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Single-Blind Method
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Microspheres
  • Male
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Doxorubicin
  • Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular