Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cadotte, MW; Borer, ET; Seabloom, EW; Cavender-Bares, J; Harpole, WS; Cleland, E; Davies, KF
Published in: Diversity and Distributions
November 1, 2010

Aim Increasingly, ecologists are using evolutionary relationships to infer the mechanisms of community assembly. However, modern communities are being invaded by non-indigenous species. Since natives have been associated with one another through evolutionary time, the forces promoting character and niche divergence should be high. On the other hand, exotics have evolved elsewhere, meaning that conserved traits may be more important in their new ranges. Thus, co-occurrence over sufficient time-scales for reciprocal evolution may alter how phylogenetic relationships influence assembly. Here, we examined the phylogenetic structure of native and exotic plant communities across a large-scale gradient in species richness and asked whether local assemblages are composed of more or less closely related natives and exotics and whether phylogenetic turnover among plots and among sites across this gradient is driven by turnover in close or distant relatives differentially for natives and exotics.Location Central and northern California, USA.Methods We used data from 30 to 50 replicate plots at four sites and constructed a maximum likelihood molecular phylogeny using the genes: matK, rbcl, ITS1 and 5.8s. We compared community-level measures of native and exotic phylogenetic diversity and among-plot phylobetadiversity.Results There were few exotic clades, but they tended to be widespread. Exotic species were phylogenetically clustered within communities and showed low phylogenetic turnover among communities. In contrast, the more species-rich native communities showed higher phylogenetic dispersion and turnover among sites.Main conclusions The assembly of native and exotic subcommunities appears to reflect the evolutionary histories of these species and suggests that shared traits drive exotic patterns while evolutionary differentiation drives native assembly. Current invasions appear to be causing phylogenetic homogenization at regional scales. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Diversity and Distributions

DOI

EISSN

1472-4642

ISSN

1366-9516

Publication Date

November 1, 2010

Volume

16

Issue

6

Start / End Page

892 / 901

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cadotte, M. W., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., Cavender-Bares, J., Harpole, W. S., Cleland, E., & Davies, K. F. (2010). Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California. Diversity and Distributions, 16(6), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00700.x
Cadotte, M. W., E. T. Borer, E. W. Seabloom, J. Cavender-Bares, W. S. Harpole, E. Cleland, and K. F. Davies. “Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California.” Diversity and Distributions 16, no. 6 (November 1, 2010): 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00700.x.
Cadotte MW, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Cavender-Bares J, Harpole WS, Cleland E, et al. Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California. Diversity and Distributions. 2010 Nov 1;16(6):892–901.
Cadotte, M. W., et al. “Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California.” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 16, no. 6, Nov. 2010, pp. 892–901. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00700.x.
Cadotte MW, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Cavender-Bares J, Harpole WS, Cleland E, Davies KF. Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California. Diversity and Distributions. 2010 Nov 1;16(6):892–901.
Journal cover image

Published In

Diversity and Distributions

DOI

EISSN

1472-4642

ISSN

1366-9516

Publication Date

November 1, 2010

Volume

16

Issue

6

Start / End Page

892 / 901

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 41 Environmental sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences