Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Clemens, JQ; Schuster, TG; Konnak, JW; McGuire, EJ; Faerber, GJ
Published in: J Urol
October 2001

PURPOSE: We determined the actuarial revision rate for artificial urinary sphincters implanted in patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 70 consecutive patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy and who underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter implantation at the University of Michigan between 1984 and 1999. Questionnaires were mailed to all patients with an indwelling device, and telephone calls were placed to those who did not respond to the mailing. Information about surgical revision and current continence status was obtained from chart review and questionnaire response. The Kaplan-Meier curves for actuarial freedom from operative revision were constructed. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients with available postoperative data 24 (36%) required reoperation at a mean followup of 41 months. The 5-year actuarial rate for freedom from any operative revision was 50%, and the corresponding rate for cuff revision was 60%. A single operative revision did not predispose the patient to further revision. Questionnaire data indicated a continence rate of 80% (range 0 to 2 pads). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients who were incontinent after radical prostatectomy may expect to undergo operative revision within 5 years after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Despite this high reoperation rate, an excellent level of continence is maintained.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Urol

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

October 2001

Volume

166

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1372 / 1375

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Reoperation
  • Prostatectomy
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Aged
  • Actuarial Analysis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Clemens, J. Q., Schuster, T. G., Konnak, J. W., McGuire, E. J., & Faerber, G. J. (2001). Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis. J Urol, 166(4), 1372–1375.
Clemens, J. Q., T. G. Schuster, J. W. Konnak, E. J. McGuire, and G. J. Faerber. “Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis.J Urol 166, no. 4 (October 2001): 1372–75.
Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW, McGuire EJ, Faerber GJ. Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis. J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1372–5.
Clemens JQ, Schuster TG, Konnak JW, McGuire EJ, Faerber GJ. Revision rate after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for incontinence after radical prostatectomy: actuarial analysis. J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1372–1375.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

October 2001

Volume

166

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1372 / 1375

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Reoperation
  • Prostatectomy
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Aged
  • Actuarial Analysis