Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Heneghan, C; Ward, A; Perera, R; Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, ; Bankhead, C; Fuller, A; Stevens, R; Bradford, K; Tyndel, S; Ansell, J ...
Published in: Lancet
January 28, 2012

BACKGROUND: Uptake of self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation [corrected] has remained inconsistent, despite good evidence of their effectiveness. To clarify the value of self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation, we did a meta-analysis of individual patient data addressing several important gaps in the evidence, including an estimate of the effect on time to death, first major haemorrhage, and thromboembolism. METHODS: We searched Ovid versions of Embase (1980-2009) and Medline (1966-2009), limiting searches to randomised trials with a maximally sensitive strategy. We approached all authors of included trials and requested individual patient data: primary outcomes were time to death, first major haemorrhage, and first thromboembolic event. We did prespecified subgroup analyses according to age, type of control-group care (anticoagulation-clinic care vs primary care), self-testing alone versus self-management, and sex. We analysed patients with mechanical heart valves or atrial fibrillation separately. We used a random-effect model method to calculate pooled hazard ratios and did tests for interaction and heterogeneity, and calculated a time-specific number needed to treat. FINDINGS: Of 1357 abstracts, we included 11 trials with data for 6417 participants and 12,800 person-years of follow-up. We reported a significant reduction in thromboembolic events in the self-monitoring group (hazard ratio 0·51; 95% CI 0·31-0·85) but not for major haemorrhagic events (0·88, 0·74-1·06) or death (0·82, 0·62-1·09). Participants younger than 55 years showed a striking reduction in thrombotic events (hazard ratio 0·33, 95% CI 0·17-0·66), as did participants with mechanical heart valve (0·52, 0·35-0·77). Analysis of major outcomes in the very elderly (age ≥85 years, n=99) showed no significant adverse effects of the intervention for all outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Our analysis showed that self-monitoring and self-management of oral coagulation is a safe option for suitable patients of all ages. Patients should also be offered the option to self-manage their disease with suitable health-care support as back-up. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Technology Assessment Programme, UK NIHR National School for Primary Care Research.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Lancet

DOI

EISSN

1474-547X

Publication Date

January 28, 2012

Volume

379

Issue

9813

Start / End Page

322 / 334

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Vitamin K
  • Thromboembolism
  • Self Care
  • International Normalized Ratio
  • Humans
  • Hemorrhage
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Drug Monitoring
  • Anticoagulants
  • Administration, Oral
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Heneghan, C., Ward, A., Perera, R., Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, ., Bankhead, C., Fuller, A., … Zittermann, A. (2012). Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet, 379(9813), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61294-4
Heneghan, Carl, Alison Ward, Rafael Perera, Rafael Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, Clare Bankhead, Alice Fuller, Richard Stevens, et al. “Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.Lancet 379, no. 9813 (January 28, 2012): 322–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61294-4.
Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, Bankhead C, Fuller A, et al. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):322–34.
Heneghan, Carl, et al. “Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9813, Jan. 2012, pp. 322–34. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61294-4.
Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist Collaboration, Bankhead C, Fuller A, Stevens R, Bradford K, Tyndel S, Alonso-Coello P, Ansell J, Beyth R, Bernardo A, Christensen TD, Cromheecke ME, Edson RG, Fitzmaurice D, Gadisseur APA, Garcia-Alamino JM, Gardiner C, Hasenkam JM, Jacobson A, Kaatz S, Kamali F, Khan TI, Knight E, Körtke H, Levi M, Matchar D, Menéndez-Jándula B, Rakovac I, Schaefer C, Siebenhofer A, Souto JC, Sunderji R, Gin K, Shalansky K, Völler H, Wagner O, Zittermann A. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):322–334.
Journal cover image

Published In

Lancet

DOI

EISSN

1474-547X

Publication Date

January 28, 2012

Volume

379

Issue

9813

Start / End Page

322 / 334

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Vitamin K
  • Thromboembolism
  • Self Care
  • International Normalized Ratio
  • Humans
  • Hemorrhage
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Drug Monitoring
  • Anticoagulants
  • Administration, Oral