Kaminsky, D., Coates, A., Culver, B., Cockcroft, D., Hallstrand, T., Haynes, J., … Wanger, J. (2019). Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test? Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 199(8), 1038. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201811-2216LE

Kaminsky, David, Allan Coates, Bruce Culver, Donald Cockcroft, Teal Hallstrand, Jeffrey Haynes, Neil MacIntyre, and Jack Wanger. “Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199, no. 8 (April 15, 2019): 1038. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201811-2216LE.

Kaminsky D, Coates A, Culver B, Cockcroft D, Hallstrand T, Haynes J, et al. Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):1038.

Kaminsky, David, et al. “Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, vol. 199, no. 8, Apr. 2019, p. 1038. Pubmed, doi:10.1164/rccm.201811-2216LE.

Kaminsky D, Coates A, Culver B, Cockcroft D, Hallstrand T, Haynes J, MacIntyre N, Wanger J. Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 15;199(8):1038.