Skip to main content

Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Rotta, AT; Gunnarsson, B; Fuhrman, BP; Hernan, LJ; Steinhorn, DM
Published in: Crit Care Med
November 2001

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of different protective and nonprotective mechanical ventilation strategies on the degree of pulmonary inflammation, oxidative damage, and hemodynamic stability in a saline lavage model of acute lung injury. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, in vivo animal laboratory study. SETTING: Animal research facility of a health sciences university. SUBJECTS: Forty-six New Zealand White rabbits. INTERVENTIONS: Mature rabbits were instrumented with a tracheostomy and vascular catheters. Lavage-injured rabbits were randomized to receive conventional ventilation with either a) low peak end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, PEEP of 2 cm H2O); b) high PEEP (tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, PEEP of 10 cm H2O); c) low tidal volume with PEEP above Pflex (open lung strategy, tidal volume of 6 mL/kg, PEEP set 2 cm H2O > Pflex); or d) high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Animals were ventilated for 4 hrs. Lung lavage fluid and tissue samples were obtained immediately after animals were killed. Lung lavage fluid was assayed for measurements of total protein, elastase activity, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and malondialdehyde. Lung tissue homogenates were assayed for measurements of myeloperoxidase activity and malondialdehyde. The need for inotropic support was recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Animals that received a lung protective strategy (open lung or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation) exhibited more favorable oxygenation and lung mechanics compared with the low PEEP and high PEEP groups. Animals ventilated by a lung protective strategy also showed attenuation of inflammation (reduced tracheal fluid protein, tracheal fluid elastase, tracheal fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and pulmonary leukostasis). Animals treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation had attenuated oxidative injury to the lung and greater hemodynamic stability compared with the other experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lung protective strategies were associated with improved oxygenation, attenuated inflammation, and decreased lung damage. However, in this small-animal model of acute lung injury, an open lung strategy with deliberate hypercapnia was associated with significant hemodynamic instability.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Crit Care Med

DOI

ISSN

0090-3493

Publication Date

November 2001

Volume

29

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2176 / 2184

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Rabbits
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration
  • Models, Biological
  • Lipid Peroxidation
  • High-Frequency Jet Ventilation
  • Hemodynamics
  • Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Rotta, A. T., Gunnarsson, B., Fuhrman, B. P., Hernan, L. J., & Steinhorn, D. M. (2001). Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med, 29(11), 2176–2184. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200111000-00021
Rotta, A. T., B. Gunnarsson, B. P. Fuhrman, L. J. Hernan, and D. M. Steinhorn. “Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury.Crit Care Med 29, no. 11 (November 2001): 2176–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200111000-00021.
Rotta AT, Gunnarsson B, Fuhrman BP, Hernan LJ, Steinhorn DM. Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov;29(11):2176–84.
Rotta, A. T., et al. “Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury.Crit Care Med, vol. 29, no. 11, Nov. 2001, pp. 2176–84. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/00003246-200111000-00021.
Rotta AT, Gunnarsson B, Fuhrman BP, Hernan LJ, Steinhorn DM. Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov;29(11):2176–2184.

Published In

Crit Care Med

DOI

ISSN

0090-3493

Publication Date

November 2001

Volume

29

Issue

11

Start / End Page

2176 / 2184

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Rabbits
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration
  • Models, Biological
  • Lipid Peroxidation
  • High-Frequency Jet Ventilation
  • Hemodynamics
  • Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
  • Animals