Skip to main content

PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Doll, JA; Jones, WS; Lokhnygina, Y; Culpepper, S; Parks, RL; Calhoun, C; Au, DH; Patel, MR
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
February 2019

Background Guidelines recommend patient engagement in shared decision-making regarding coronary revascularization, but studies demonstrate poor patient understanding of risks, benefits, and alternatives. Effective strategies are needed to integrate informed patient preferences into clinical care, particularly for patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Methods and Results We developed a web-based decision aid to educate patients and survey their treatment preferences before angiography. We compared knowledge, attitudes, and preferences of 203 patients with and without use of the decision aid. In a pilot cluster-randomized study, cardiologists were assigned to receive versus not receive patient preferences, with subsequent assessment of treatment decisions. The median age of participants was 64 years, 62% were men, 74% were white, and a similar number had acute presentation (49% non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina) and stable presentation (51% stable angina or atypical symptoms). Most patients preferred treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with either medical therapy alone (63% versus 21%) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (81% versus 7%). The decision aid was associated with improved performance on a 6-item knowledge scale (mean, 2.7 versus 2.2 questions correct; P<0.01) and greater interest in shared decision-making but not an overall change in patient preferences. The pilot cluster-randomized study demonstrated the feasibility of integrating patient preference information into clinical care, although providing preferences to the clinicians did not improve concordance between preference and treatment. Conclusions A web-based decision aid was associated with improved patient knowledge and greater desire to participate in shared decision-making for coronary revascularization. Most patients preferred percutaneous coronary intervention to either medical therapy alone or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Further investigation is needed to determine the impact of patient preferences on clinical decision-making and outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02272062.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

February 2019

Volume

12

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e005244

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Pilot Projects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • North Carolina
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Doll, J. A., Jones, W. S., Lokhnygina, Y., Culpepper, S., Parks, R. L., Calhoun, C., … Patel, M. R. (2019). PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 12(2), e005244. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244
Doll, Jacob A., W Schuyler Jones, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Sara Culpepper, Robin L. Parks, Christy Calhoun, David H. Au, and Manesh R. Patel. “PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 12, no. 2 (February 2019): e005244. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244.
Doll JA, Jones WS, Lokhnygina Y, Culpepper S, Parks RL, Calhoun C, et al. PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005244.
Doll, Jacob A., et al. “PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, vol. 12, no. 2, Feb. 2019, p. e005244. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244.
Doll JA, Jones WS, Lokhnygina Y, Culpepper S, Parks RL, Calhoun C, Au DH, Patel MR. PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005244.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

February 2019

Volume

12

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e005244

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Prospective Studies
  • Pilot Projects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Patient Selection
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • North Carolina
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Middle Aged
  • Male