Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan

Publication ,  Journal Article
Litzow, EL; Pattanayak, SK; Thinley, T
Published in: World Development
September 1, 2019

Rural electrification (RE) is a core component of the Sustainable Development Goals and a major focal point of the global development community. Despite this focus, more than one billion people worldwide lack access to electricity, and electrification rates need to more than quadruple to meet international goals. We believe that lack of progress is partly driven by a know-do gap, a misalignment between academic research and the information needs of policy makers. Most studies measuring the impacts of electrification focus on precise estimation of a few outcomes, specifically health, education and productivity impacts. Other important impacts, e.g. environmental, have remained largely unstudied. As a consequence, quantifying the full set of costs and benefits of expanding electricity access is difficult and rarely done. When cost benefit analyses are done, they are often incomplete, and conclusions are highly susceptible to unavailable or uncertain parameters. We illustrate these arguments in the case of Bhutan, where RE rates have expanded rapidly in the past few decades. We show that RE via grid extension had positive impacts related to fuelwood consumption, education, and employment, but we do not find an effect on health. We then use these impact estimates to conduct cost-benefit analyses. For the cost-benefit parameters not available from our impact evaluation, we transfer reasonable estimates from related contexts. To acknowledge the uncertainty induced by this process, we conduct Monte Carlo analyses and confirm that, while the private NPV calculations are robust to alternative parameter values, the social returns are sensitive to estimates of the social cost of carbon and costs of grid operation and maintenance. Based on this exercise, we highlight research gaps that persist and that preclude 1) careful cost-benefit analysis of RE more generally and 2) financial investment in the sector.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

World Development

DOI

EISSN

1873-5991

ISSN

0305-750X

Publication Date

September 1, 2019

Volume

121

Start / End Page

75 / 96

Related Subject Headings

  • Development Studies
  • 44 Human society
  • 38 Economics
  • 16 Studies in Human Society
  • 14 Economics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Litzow, E. L., Pattanayak, S. K., & Thinley, T. (2019). Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan. World Development, 121, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.04.002
Litzow, E. L., S. K. Pattanayak, and T. Thinley. “Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan.” World Development 121 (September 1, 2019): 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.04.002.
Litzow EL, Pattanayak SK, Thinley T. Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan. World Development. 2019 Sep 1;121:75–96.
Litzow, E. L., et al. “Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan.” World Development, vol. 121, Sept. 2019, pp. 75–96. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.04.002.
Litzow EL, Pattanayak SK, Thinley T. Returns to rural electrification: Evidence from Bhutan. World Development. 2019 Sep 1;121:75–96.
Journal cover image

Published In

World Development

DOI

EISSN

1873-5991

ISSN

0305-750X

Publication Date

September 1, 2019

Volume

121

Start / End Page

75 / 96

Related Subject Headings

  • Development Studies
  • 44 Human society
  • 38 Economics
  • 16 Studies in Human Society
  • 14 Economics