Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Rationale, design, and baseline data for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing depression screening strategies after acute coronary syndrome: The comparison of depression identification after acute Coronary Syndromes-Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes (CODIACS-QOL) trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Moise, N; Davidson, KW; Cheung, YKK; Clarke, GN; Dolor, RJ; Duer-Hefele, J; Ladapo, JA; Margolis, KL; St Onge, T; Parsons, F; Retuerto, J ...
Published in: Contemp Clin Trials
September 2019

BACKGROUND: Elevated depressive symptoms among survivors of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) confer recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality, worse quality of life, and higher healthcare costs. While multiple scientific groups advise routine depression screening for ACS survivors, no randomized trials exist to inform this screening recommendation. We aimed to assess the effect of screening for depression on change in quality of life over 18 months among ACS patients. METHODS: The Comparison of Depression Identification after Acute Coronary Syndrome on Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes (CODIACS-QoL) trial is a pragmatic, 3-arm trial that randomized ACS patients to 1) systematic depression screening using the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and if positive screen (PHQ-8 ≥ 10), notification of primary care providers (PCPs) and invitation to participate in centralized, patient-preference, stepped depression care (Screen, Notify, and Treat, N = 499); 2) systematic depression screening and PCP notification only (Screen and Notify, N = 501); and 3) usual care (No Screen, N = 500). Adults hospitalized for ACS in the previous 2-12 months without prior history of depression were eligible for participation. Key outcomes will be quality-adjusted life years (primary), cost of health care utilization, and depression-free days across 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 1500 patients were randomized in the CODIACS-QOL trial (28.3% women; 16.3% Hispanic; mean age 65.9 (11.5) years). Only 7% of ACS survivors had elevated depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Using a novel randomization schema and pragmatic design principles, the CODIACS-QoL trial achieved its enrollment target. Eventual results of this trial will inform future depression screening recommendations in cardiac patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01993017).

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Contemp Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1559-2030

Publication Date

September 2019

Volume

84

Start / End Page

105826

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sex Factors
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Quality of Life
  • Public Health
  • Primary Health Care
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Moise, N., Davidson, K. W., Cheung, Y. K. K., Clarke, G. N., Dolor, R. J., Duer-Hefele, J., … Kronish, I. M. (2019). Rationale, design, and baseline data for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing depression screening strategies after acute coronary syndrome: The comparison of depression identification after acute Coronary Syndromes-Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes (CODIACS-QOL) trial. Contemp Clin Trials, 84, 105826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2019.105826
Moise, Nathalie, Karina W. Davidson, Ying Kuen K. Cheung, Gregory N. Clarke, Rowena J. Dolor, Joan Duer-Hefele, Joseph A. Ladapo, et al. “Rationale, design, and baseline data for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing depression screening strategies after acute coronary syndrome: The comparison of depression identification after acute Coronary Syndromes-Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes (CODIACS-QOL) trial.Contemp Clin Trials 84 (September 2019): 105826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2019.105826.
Moise N, Davidson KW, Cheung YKK, Clarke GN, Dolor RJ, Duer-Hefele J, Ladapo JA, Margolis KL, St Onge T, Parsons F, Retuerto J, Schmit KM, Thanataveerat A, Kronish IM. Rationale, design, and baseline data for a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing depression screening strategies after acute coronary syndrome: The comparison of depression identification after acute Coronary Syndromes-Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes (CODIACS-QOL) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105826.
Journal cover image

Published In

Contemp Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1559-2030

Publication Date

September 2019

Volume

84

Start / End Page

105826

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sex Factors
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Quality of Life
  • Public Health
  • Primary Health Care
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic