Skip to main content

"What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya

Publication ,  Journal Article
Green, EP; Whitcomb, A; Kahumbura, C; Rosen, JG; Goyal, S; Achieng, D; Bellows, B
Published in: Gates Open Research
January 1, 2019

Background: Text message-based interventions have been shown to have consistently positive effects on health improvement and behavior change. Some studies suggest that personalization, tailoring, and interactivity can increase efficacy. With the rise in artificial intelligence and its incorporation into interventions, there is an opportunity to rethink how these characteristics are designed for greater effect. A key step in this process is to better understand how users engage with interventions. In this paper, we apply a text mining approach to characterize the ways that Kenyan men and women communicated with the first iterations of askNivi, a free sexual and reproductive health information service. Methods: We tokenized and processed more than 179,000 anonymized messages that users exchanged with live agents, enabling us to count word frequency overall, by sex, and by age/sex cohorts. We also conducted two manual coding exercises: (1) We manually classified the intent of 3,834 user messages in a training dataset; and (2) We manually coded all conversations between a random subset of 100 users who engaged in extended chats. Results: Between September 2017 and January 2019, 28,021 users (mean age 22.5 years, 63% female) sent 87,180 messages to askNivi, and 18 agents sent 92,429 replies. Users wrote most often about family planning methods, contraception, side effects, pregnancy, menstruation, and sex, but we observed different patterns by sex and age. User intents largely reflected the marketing focus on reproductive health, but other topics emerged. Most users sought factual information, but requests for advice and symptom reports were common. Conclusions: Young people in Kenya have a great desire for accurate and reliable information on health and wellbeing, which is easy to access and trustworthy. Text mining is one way to better understand how users engage with interventions like askNivi and maximize what artificial intelligence has to offer.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Gates Open Research

DOI

EISSN

2572-4754

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Green, E. P., Whitcomb, A., Kahumbura, C., Rosen, J. G., Goyal, S., Achieng, D., & Bellows, B. (2019). "What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya. Gates Open Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12914.1
Green, E. P., A. Whitcomb, C. Kahumbura, J. G. Rosen, S. Goyal, D. Achieng, and B. Bellows. “"What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya.” Gates Open Research 3 (January 1, 2019). https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12914.1.
Green EP, Whitcomb A, Kahumbura C, Rosen JG, Goyal S, Achieng D, et al. "What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya. Gates Open Research. 2019 Jan 1;3.
Green, E. P., et al. “"What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya.” Gates Open Research, vol. 3, Jan. 2019. Scopus, doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.12914.1.
Green EP, Whitcomb A, Kahumbura C, Rosen JG, Goyal S, Achieng D, Bellows B. "What is the best method of family planning for me?": A text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya. Gates Open Research. 2019 Jan 1;3.

Published In

Gates Open Research

DOI

EISSN

2572-4754

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences