Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ayers, K; Shi, C; Washington, K; Yachimski, P
Published in: Surg Endosc
August 2013

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy has emerged as an alternative to surgical esophagectomy for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated neoplasia. Accurate pretreatment staging is essential to ensure an appropriate choice of therapy and optimal long-term outcomes. This study aimed to assess the frequency with which expert histopathologic review of biopsies combined with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) would alter the pretreatment diagnosis of BE-associated neoplasia. METHODS: Patients referred to the Vanderbilt Barrett's Esophagus Endoscopic Treatment Program (V-BEET) were retrospectively identified. Demographic, histopathologic, and endoscopic data were extracted from the medical record. RESULTS: For this study, 29 subjects referred for endoscopic staging of BE fulfilled the entry criteria. The referral diagnosis was low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in 3 % (1/29), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 62 % (18/29), intramucosal adenocarcinoma (T1a) adenocarcinoma in 17 % (5/29), and invasive adenocarcinoma in 17 % (5/29) of the subjects. Expert histopathologic review of available referral biopsy specimens altered the diagnosis in 33 % (5/15) of the cases. Further diagnostic staging with EMR showed BE without dysplasia in 10 % (3/29), LGD in 14 % (4/29), HGD in 34 % (10/29), T1a adenocarcinoma in 28 % (8/29), and invasive adenocarcinoma in 14 % (4/29) of the patients. The combination of expert histopathologic review and EMR altered the initial diagnosis for 55 % (16/29) of the subjects, with 56 % (9/16) upstaged to more advanced disease and 44 % (7/16) downstaged to less advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of combined expert histopathologic review and EMR alters the pretreatment diagnosis for the majority of patients with BE-associated neoplasia. Caution is advised for those embarking on endoscopic or surgical treatment for BE-associated neoplasia in the absence of these staging methods.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Surg Endosc

DOI

EISSN

1432-2218

Publication Date

August 2013

Volume

27

Issue

8

Start / End Page

2836 / 2840

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Precancerous Conditions
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Male
  • Intestinal Mucosa
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ayers, K., Shi, C., Washington, K., & Yachimski, P. (2013). Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett's esophagus. Surg Endosc, 27(8), 2836–2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2830-x
Ayers, Katie, Chanjuan Shi, Kay Washington, and Patrick Yachimski. “Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett's esophagus.Surg Endosc 27, no. 8 (August 2013): 2836–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2830-x.
Ayers, Katie, et al. “Expert pathology review and endoscopic mucosal resection alters the diagnosis of patients referred to undergo therapy for Barrett's esophagus.Surg Endosc, vol. 27, no. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 2836–40. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2830-x.
Journal cover image

Published In

Surg Endosc

DOI

EISSN

1432-2218

Publication Date

August 2013

Volume

27

Issue

8

Start / End Page

2836 / 2840

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • Surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Precancerous Conditions
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Male
  • Intestinal Mucosa
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female