Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Reeve, BB; McFatrich, M; Mack, JW; Maurer, SH; Jacobs, SS; Freyer, DR; Withycombe, JS; Baker, JN; Castellino, SM; Lin, L; Lucas, NR; Hinds, PS
Published in: J Natl Cancer Inst
November 1, 2020

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements linked to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading may improve symptom adverse event (AE) reporting in pediatric oncology trials. We evaluated construct validity, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the Ped-PRO-CTCAE measurement system for children and adolescents undergoing cancer care. METHODS: A total of 482 children and adolescents (7-18 years, 41.5% not non-Hispanic white) newly diagnosed with cancer and their caregivers participated from nine pediatric oncology hospitals. Surveys were completed at 72 hours preceding treatment initiation (T1) and at follow-up (T2) approximately 7-17 days later for chemotherapy, and 4+ weeks for radiation. Psychometric analyses examined the relationship of Ped-PRO-CTCAE items (assessing 62 symptom AEs) with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Lansky Play-Performance Scale, and medication use. A separate test-retest study included 46 children. RESULTS: Ped-PRO-CTCAE and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale were strongly correlated across age groups at T2: 7-12 years (r = 0.62-0.80), 13-15 years (r = 0.44-0.94), and 16-18 years (r = 0.65-0.98); and over time. The Ped-PRO-CTCAE was strongly correlated with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric measures at T2; for example, pain interference (r = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.76), fatigue severity (r = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69), and depression severity (r = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.81). Ped-PRO-CTCAE items differentiated children by Lansky Play-Performance Scale and by medication use. Test-retest agreement ranged from 54.3% to 93.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study provided evidence for the construct validity and reliability of the core Ped-PRO-CTCAE symptom AE items relative to several established measures. Additional responsiveness data with clinical anchors are recommended. Incorporation of Ped-PRO-CTCAE in trials may lead to a better understanding of the cancer treatment experience.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Natl Cancer Inst

DOI

EISSN

1460-2105

Publication Date

November 1, 2020

Volume

112

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1143 / 1152

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Terminology as Topic
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Reeve, B. B., McFatrich, M., Mack, J. W., Maurer, S. H., Jacobs, S. S., Freyer, D. R., … Hinds, P. S. (2020). Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Natl Cancer Inst, 112(11), 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa016
Reeve, Bryce B., Molly McFatrich, Jennifer W. Mack, Scott H. Maurer, Shana S. Jacobs, David R. Freyer, Janice S. Withycombe, et al. “Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.J Natl Cancer Inst 112, no. 11 (November 1, 2020): 1143–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa016.
Reeve BB, McFatrich M, Mack JW, Maurer SH, Jacobs SS, Freyer DR, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1143–52.
Reeve, Bryce B., et al. “Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.J Natl Cancer Inst, vol. 112, no. 11, Nov. 2020, pp. 1143–52. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa016.
Reeve BB, McFatrich M, Mack JW, Maurer SH, Jacobs SS, Freyer DR, Withycombe JS, Baker JN, Castellino SM, Lin L, Lucas NR, Hinds PS. Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1143–1152.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Natl Cancer Inst

DOI

EISSN

1460-2105

Publication Date

November 1, 2020

Volume

112

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1143 / 1152

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Terminology as Topic
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Humans
  • Female