Skip to main content

In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology

Publication ,  Conference
Smith, TB; Abadi, E; Sauer, TJ; Fu, W; Solomon, J; Samei, E
Published in: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
January 1, 2020

The purpose of this study was to develop, validate, and evaluate a method for measuring noise texture directly from patient CT images (i.e., “in vivo”). The method identifies target regions within patient scans which are least likely to have major contribution of patient anatomy, detrends these regions locally, and measures noise power spectrum (NPS) there using previously phantom-validated techniques. Method development and validation used scanner-specific CT simulations of computational, anthropomorphic phantom (XCAT phantom at three phases of contrast enhancement) with known ground truth of the NPS. Simulations were based on a clinical scanner (Definition Flash, Siemens) and clinically relevant settings (tube voltage of 120kV at 3 dose levels). Images were reconstructed with filtered backprojection (kernel: B31, B41, B50) and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (kernel: I31, I41, I50) algorithms using a manufacturer-specific reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). All NPS measurements were made in the liver. Ground-truth NPS were taken as the sum of 1) a measurement in parenchymal regions of anatomy-subtracted (i.e. “noise only”) scans, and 2) a measurement in the same region of “noise-free” (pre-noise-insertion) images. To assess the performance of the in vivo NPS, the accuracy and bias of NPS average frequency (favg), and integrated noise magnitude were reported across the simulated scan population representing 2 reconstruction algorithms, 3 kernels, 3 dose levels, and 3 liver vasculature-to-parenchyma contrast levels. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient pairs were 0.97 and 0.93, and 1.0 and 0.99 for favg and noise magnitude, respectively. Finally, the NPS estimation method was further deployed on clinical cases to assess the feasibility of clinical analysis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

ISBN

9781510633919

Publication Date

January 1, 2020

Volume

11312
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Smith, T. B., Abadi, E., Sauer, T. J., Fu, W., Solomon, J., & Samei, E. (2020). In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology. In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE (Vol. 11312). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549268
Smith, T. B., E. Abadi, T. J. Sauer, W. Fu, J. Solomon, and E. Samei. “In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology.” In Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 11312, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549268.
Smith TB, Abadi E, Sauer TJ, Fu W, Solomon J, Samei E. In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology. In: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2020.
Smith, T. B., et al. “In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology.” Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 11312, 2020. Scopus, doi:10.1117/12.2549268.
Smith TB, Abadi E, Sauer TJ, Fu W, Solomon J, Samei E. In vivo noise texture estimation: Development and validation of an automated methodology. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 2020.

Published In

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

DOI

ISSN

1605-7422

ISBN

9781510633919

Publication Date

January 1, 2020

Volume

11312